From: Marko Schulz <in6x059@...>
Date: 2001-04-29T08:20:05+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:14392] Re: Separating the wheat from the chaff.

On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 02:23:25AM +0900, Marc Butler wrote:
> 
> Would it be possible to split the ruby-talk into two groups
> delineated by subject matter?  My personal intuition is one group
> named 'community' for discussion of predominantly non-technical
> issues such as Mascots, book reviews, ruby group meetings, and "what
> other people said about ruby" discussions.  The other list would be
> focused on technical concerns, such as language problems, questions
> and patches. 

I would like to object. I don't think that the traffic on the list is
so high, that a split is necessary. Most non-technical issues can
easily be spotted by the subject. A split is never a clean thing but
always comes with costs.

I am personally surprised that there are so few questions on the list
concerning problems using ruby. Obviously the language is so easy and
clear that people on the list can focus on things around ruby or how
to extend it.

> Yes, I expect to be flamed for this post.

Why?

-- 
marko schulz

                          Dieser Satz beinhalten drei Fehller.