[#13775] Problems with racc rule definitions — Michael Neumann <neumann@...>

15 messages 2001/04/17
[#13795] Re: Problems with racc rule definitions — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2001/04/18

Hi,

[#13940] From Guido, with love... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

52 messages 2001/04/20

[#13953] regexp — James Ponder <james@...>

Hi, I'm new to ruby and am coming from a perl background - therefore I

19 messages 2001/04/21

[#14033] Distributed Ruby and heterogeneous networks — harryo@... (Harry Ohlsen)

I wrote my first small distributed application yesterday and it worked

15 messages 2001/04/22

[#14040] RCR: getClassFromString method — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

It would be nice to have a function that returns a class type given a

20 messages 2001/04/22

[#14130] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Guy N. Hurst wrote:

21 messages 2001/04/24
[#14148] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — Stephen White <spwhite@...> 2001/04/24

On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Conrad Schneiker wrote:

[#14188] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/04/25

Hi,

[#14193] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "W. Kent Starr" <elderburn@...> 2001/04/25

On Tuesday 24 April 2001 23:02, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14138] Re: python on the smalltalk VM — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>

FYI: Thought this might be of interest to the JRuby and Ruby/GUI folks.

27 messages 2001/04/24
[#14153] Re: python on the smalltalk VM — Andrew Kuchling <akuchlin@...> 2001/04/24

Conrad Schneiker <schneik@austin.ibm.com> writes:

[#14154] array#flatten! question — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/04/24

Hello.

[#14159] Can I insert into an array — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/04/24

Ok, this may be a dumb question, but, is it possible to insert into an

[#14162] Re: Can I insert into an array — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/04/24

Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> writes:

[#14289] RCR: Array#insert — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2001/04/27

At Wed, 25 Apr 2001 01:28:36 +0900,

[#14221] An or in an if. — Tim Pettman <tjp@...>

Hi there,

18 messages 2001/04/25

[#14267] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Danny van Bruggen,

16 messages 2001/04/26

[#14452] How to do it the Ruby-way 3 — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

First a question: Why is

21 messages 2001/04/30

[ruby-talk:14043] Re: Distributed Ruby and heterogeneous networks

From: ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)
Date: 2001-04-22 22:10:04 UTC
List: ruby-talk #14043
In article <3ae33b64.136837802@news-server>,
Harry Ohlsen <harryo@zipworld.com.au> wrote:
>>In my experience you should be running the same version of Ruby and the 
>>same version of DRb on both client and server.  DRb is very dependent on 
>>marshalling (serialization) and it seems that the way certain types of 
>>objects are marshelled changes in some of the newer versions of Ruby.
>
>Thanks, Phill.  That's going to cause me a minor problem, since I want
>to run the server on Windows 2000 and clients on various *NIX boxes.
>
>The reason that's a problem is that, as far as I know, there's no
>easily installable version of 1.7 for Windows and I'd prefer not to go
>backwards on my Linux boxes.

Well, since 1.7 is not a stable release, your best bet is to use the same 
version on Linux as you have on your Windows boxen - that's what I'm 
doing.

Later on, when 1.8 is released and available as an installable .exe for 
Winodows you can move everything to it - that really is your best bet for 
now.

BTW: I did notice that when I installed Ruby on my Windows Boxen a couple 
of months ago, that the version of DRb did not match the version that came 
with the source tar file that I used to build on Linux/Solaris - this 
caused trouble till I figured it out and put DRb 1.3.1 on all boxes 
(Windows and *nix) since then I've had no trouble with druby, and in fact 
it's become a very useful feature of Ruby that will lead to the demise of 
Perl in my particular application.

>
>Oh well, I didn't waste much time on it, because DRb is so nicely
>written that it only took about three lines of code in the server and
>the client to get my application going and, as has been my experience
>with most Ruby code, it worked as soon as I got my syntax correct.
>

Yes, DRb is great!  We should really be publishing more code that explains 
it's use and shows how easy it is to use (I hope to write something up to 
submit to either Linux Journal or IBM development works soon) - this would 
encourage more movement toward Ruby.  Perl doesn't have anything like it 
and neither does Python as far as I know.  Of course there is XML-RPC, 
but it is nowhere near as easy to use.

Phil

In This Thread