[#13775] Problems with racc rule definitions — Michael Neumann <neumann@...>

15 messages 2001/04/17
[#13795] Re: Problems with racc rule definitions — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2001/04/18

Hi,

[#13940] From Guido, with love... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

52 messages 2001/04/20

[#13953] regexp — James Ponder <james@...>

Hi, I'm new to ruby and am coming from a perl background - therefore I

19 messages 2001/04/21

[#14033] Distributed Ruby and heterogeneous networks — harryo@... (Harry Ohlsen)

I wrote my first small distributed application yesterday and it worked

15 messages 2001/04/22

[#14040] RCR: getClassFromString method — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

It would be nice to have a function that returns a class type given a

20 messages 2001/04/22

[#14130] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Guy N. Hurst wrote:

21 messages 2001/04/24
[#14148] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — Stephen White <spwhite@...> 2001/04/24

On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Conrad Schneiker wrote:

[#14188] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/04/25

Hi,

[#14193] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "W. Kent Starr" <elderburn@...> 2001/04/25

On Tuesday 24 April 2001 23:02, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14138] Re: python on the smalltalk VM — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>

FYI: Thought this might be of interest to the JRuby and Ruby/GUI folks.

27 messages 2001/04/24
[#14153] Re: python on the smalltalk VM — Andrew Kuchling <akuchlin@...> 2001/04/24

Conrad Schneiker <schneik@austin.ibm.com> writes:

[#14154] array#flatten! question — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/04/24

Hello.

[#14159] Can I insert into an array — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/04/24

Ok, this may be a dumb question, but, is it possible to insert into an

[#14162] Re: Can I insert into an array — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/04/24

Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> writes:

[#14289] RCR: Array#insert — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2001/04/27

At Wed, 25 Apr 2001 01:28:36 +0900,

[#14221] An or in an if. — Tim Pettman <tjp@...>

Hi there,

18 messages 2001/04/25

[#14267] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Danny van Bruggen,

16 messages 2001/04/26

[#14452] How to do it the Ruby-way 3 — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

First a question: Why is

21 messages 2001/04/30

[ruby-talk:14372] Re: SV: Re: how change instances class

From: Chris Moline <ugly-daemon@...>
Date: 2001-04-28 10:40:03 UTC
List: ruby-talk #14372
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 01:36:16PM +0900, Hal E. Fulton wrote:
> > Let me give an example of a (maybe) natural class-change operation, in
> human
> > dialog context: (This is purely fictional. I include it only in case that
> > someone might be interested)
> >
> > Language input .......Human Language Interpreter does:
> > I see something => instance of Something
> > It is a person   => change class of the instance to Human
> > It is a woman     => mix-in Female
> > No, it is a man => un-mix Female and mix-in Male
> > He looks Asian => mix in Asian
> > He is smiling     => indicate that smile is active
> > It is Haruki Murakami! => check if there is merge viloations, if not then
> > merge the instance into the Haruki Murakami instance, which does already
> > exist in the knowledge bank.
> >
> > Is the smiling person an author? => Yes. And a famous one too. [references
> > to the mentioned person are changed to Haruki Murakami instance,
> > which has an Author mix-in]
> >
> > Is Haruki Murakami smiling? => Yes, he is smiling. [information merged
> > from the temporary instance into the Haruki instance]
> >
> > Does Haruki Murakami exist? => Yes, [in the knowledge base, he is
> > represented by an instance of subclass of Something]
> >
> 
> I find this example fascinating. It does sound difficult to implement,
> though...
I am a newbie in matters like this so maybe I have it wrong but... it sounds like we already have this. Namely, I think that this is analogous to having an instantiated object whose type we don't know. i.e.

I see something
	the object already exists and now we are going to find its type

It is a person
	we have retrieved some information about its type. Perhaps by a person? method?

It is a woman
	we ran object.woman? and it returned true.

No, it is a man
	someone needs to fix the woman? method. Somehow or other we found out it was actually of type Man.

and so on...

In This Thread