[ruby-talk:13810] Re: Problems with racc rule definitions

  In mail "[ruby-talk:13807] Re: Problems with racc rule definitions"
    Michael Neumann <[e-mail]> wrote:

> > > Following racc-rule raises an error during parsing (not during 'racc parser.y'), 
> > > and I don't know why.

Ahh, I'm sorry, I did not take the point of your question.
Yes, there's no way to branch parser action by semantic value.
racc know about only symbol. Maybe your "if val[0] == ..." way is
right. Katsuhiro Ueno's xmlscan library uses also racc, and his
code is:

      | NodeType '(' nodeTestArg ')'
	  {
	    nodetype = val[0]
	    arg = val[2]
	    if arg and nodetype != 'processing-instruction' then
	      raise CompileError,
		"nodetest #{nodetype}() requires no argument"
	    end
	    [ nodetype, arg || false, false ]
	  }


Minero Aoki