[#13775] Problems with racc rule definitions — Michael Neumann <neumann@...>

15 messages 2001/04/17
[#13795] Re: Problems with racc rule definitions — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2001/04/18

Hi,

[#13940] From Guido, with love... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

52 messages 2001/04/20

[#13953] regexp — James Ponder <james@...>

Hi, I'm new to ruby and am coming from a perl background - therefore I

19 messages 2001/04/21

[#14033] Distributed Ruby and heterogeneous networks — harryo@... (Harry Ohlsen)

I wrote my first small distributed application yesterday and it worked

15 messages 2001/04/22

[#14040] RCR: getClassFromString method — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

It would be nice to have a function that returns a class type given a

20 messages 2001/04/22

[#14130] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Guy N. Hurst wrote:

21 messages 2001/04/24
[#14148] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — Stephen White <spwhite@...> 2001/04/24

On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Conrad Schneiker wrote:

[#14188] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/04/25

Hi,

[#14193] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "W. Kent Starr" <elderburn@...> 2001/04/25

On Tuesday 24 April 2001 23:02, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14138] Re: python on the smalltalk VM — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>

FYI: Thought this might be of interest to the JRuby and Ruby/GUI folks.

27 messages 2001/04/24
[#14153] Re: python on the smalltalk VM — Andrew Kuchling <akuchlin@...> 2001/04/24

Conrad Schneiker <schneik@austin.ibm.com> writes:

[#14154] array#flatten! question — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/04/24

Hello.

[#14159] Can I insert into an array — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/04/24

Ok, this may be a dumb question, but, is it possible to insert into an

[#14162] Re: Can I insert into an array — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/04/24

Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> writes:

[#14289] RCR: Array#insert — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2001/04/27

At Wed, 25 Apr 2001 01:28:36 +0900,

[#14221] An or in an if. — Tim Pettman <tjp@...>

Hi there,

18 messages 2001/04/25

[#14267] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Danny van Bruggen,

16 messages 2001/04/26

[#14452] How to do it the Ruby-way 3 — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

First a question: Why is

21 messages 2001/04/30

[ruby-talk:13997] Re: From Guido, with love...

From: "Mitch Vincent" <mitch@...>
Date: 2001-04-21 19:38:04 UTC
List: ruby-talk #13997
> >  You don't need comment when  the code is very well written.

    I don't think that could be further from the truth... Code that is well
written can still be extremely complex and hard for anyone to understand..
Besides, I define "well written code" as code that makes smart use of
whitespace, comments and hungarian notation.

> Whenever I'm trying to understand code written by someone else, typically
> the first thing I do is run it through 'sed' to get rid of the comments.

    If the comments are useless (and it's a little hard for anyone to know
that until *after*  they understand the code..) then you can ignore them or
change them to be useful.. If you got rid of the comments in any of my code
(for some of the larger projects), you'd run into trouble quick when you
made changes.. I always try to include "If you change this, you have to
change X,Y,Z over in the XYZ function etc etc" type comments... Most of the
things I include in my comments aren't the bleeding obvious, like a comment
"This checks to see if the variable iCount is above zero" right above the
if(iCount > 0) statement is useless and a total waste of space in my
opinion.. :-)

    *Good* comments are priceless, IMHO. *Good* comments can shave hours and
hours off code comprehension -- learned this from experience, though our
experiences are clearly different..

    Have a good one..

-Mitch

In This Thread