[#13775] Problems with racc rule definitions — Michael Neumann <neumann@...>

15 messages 2001/04/17
[#13795] Re: Problems with racc rule definitions — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2001/04/18

Hi,

[#13940] From Guido, with love... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

52 messages 2001/04/20

[#13953] regexp — James Ponder <james@...>

Hi, I'm new to ruby and am coming from a perl background - therefore I

19 messages 2001/04/21

[#14033] Distributed Ruby and heterogeneous networks — harryo@... (Harry Ohlsen)

I wrote my first small distributed application yesterday and it worked

15 messages 2001/04/22

[#14040] RCR: getClassFromString method — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

It would be nice to have a function that returns a class type given a

20 messages 2001/04/22

[#14130] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Guy N. Hurst wrote:

21 messages 2001/04/24
[#14148] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — Stephen White <spwhite@...> 2001/04/24

On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Conrad Schneiker wrote:

[#14188] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/04/25

Hi,

[#14193] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "W. Kent Starr" <elderburn@...> 2001/04/25

On Tuesday 24 April 2001 23:02, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14138] Re: python on the smalltalk VM — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>

FYI: Thought this might be of interest to the JRuby and Ruby/GUI folks.

27 messages 2001/04/24
[#14153] Re: python on the smalltalk VM — Andrew Kuchling <akuchlin@...> 2001/04/24

Conrad Schneiker <schneik@austin.ibm.com> writes:

[#14154] array#flatten! question — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/04/24

Hello.

[#14159] Can I insert into an array — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/04/24

Ok, this may be a dumb question, but, is it possible to insert into an

[#14162] Re: Can I insert into an array — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/04/24

Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> writes:

[#14289] RCR: Array#insert — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2001/04/27

At Wed, 25 Apr 2001 01:28:36 +0900,

[#14221] An or in an if. — Tim Pettman <tjp@...>

Hi there,

18 messages 2001/04/25

[#14267] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Danny van Bruggen,

16 messages 2001/04/26

[#14452] How to do it the Ruby-way 3 — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

First a question: Why is

21 messages 2001/04/30

[ruby-talk:13994] RE: Stripped-down Ruby?

From: brucedickey <brucedickey@...>
Date: 2001-04-21 17:59:41 UTC
List: ruby-talk #13994
You might also consider Simkin at http://www.simkin.co.uk/.

Quoted from the site:
   Simkin is a free Open-Source product which is supplied
   without support. 
   
   Available for Java(tm) or C++ and XML 
   
   Easy to embed - by overriding base classes or 
   implementing interfaces 

   Easy to script - the syntax is simpler than Javascript! 

   Low runtime overhead - you control the memory, no garbage
   collection 

   Low memory footprint - Simkin for Java is a 50k Jar file, 
   Simkin for C++ is a 200k lib file for Visual C++ 

   Flexible script files - they can contain data as well as code 

   Source code provided - customization and support available 

I've only run the examples so far -- it looks solid. 

--Bruce



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Messenger [mailto:cmessengeratinamedotcom@spamfooler.com]
> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 11:10 AM
> To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org; ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp
> Subject: [ruby-talk:13990] Stripped-down Ruby?
> 
> 
> I need to embed a scripting language in an app I'm creating 
> (a gaming app).
> The only inputs to the language will come from my app, and 
> the only output
> will go to my app.  That is, there will be no OS interaction. 
>  My app is the
> OS.
> 
> I want to use an already-developed scripting language.  
> Besides the benefit
> of saving on writing my own interpreter, the biggest benefit 
> is that I want
> users of my app to be able to reference a mature body of 
> documentation about
> the scripting language itself, apart from the hooks into my system.
> 
> So, Ruby looks like a promising candidate.  The main problem 
> with Ruby is
> that I need to strip out all the OS hooks.  This is partly a 
> security issue,
> and partly a code size issue.  Mainly the former.
> 
> Has any work been done in this direction?  That is, a Ruby 
> with absolutely
> no OS hooks?  Ideally, even memory allocation would come from 
> my app, rather
> than malloc.
> 
> 
>     - Chuck
> 
> 

In This Thread

Prev Next