[#14464] who uses Python or Ruby, and for what? — ellard2@...01.fas.harvard.edu (-11,3-3562,3-3076)

A while ago I posted a request for people to share their experiences

12 messages 2001/05/01

[#14555] Ruby as a Mac OS/X scripting language — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

10 messages 2001/05/02

[#14557] Arggg Bitten by the block var scope feature!!! — Wayne Scott <wscott@...>

13 messages 2001/05/02

[#14598] Re: Arggg Bitten by the block var scope feature!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

# On Thu, 3 May 2001, Wayne Scott wrote:

9 messages 2001/05/03

[#14636] Yet another "About private methods" question — Eric Jacoboni <jacoboni@...2.fr>

I'm still trying to figure out the semantics of private methods in Ruby.

39 messages 2001/05/04
[#14656] Re: Yet another "About private methods" question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/05/04

Eric Jacoboni <jaco@teaser.fr> writes:

[#14666] Ruby and Web Applications — "Chris Montgomery" <monty@...> 2001/05/04

Greetings from a newbie,

[#14772] Re: Ruby and Web Applications — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/05/07

On Sat, 5 May 2001, Chris Montgomery wrote:

[#14710] Why's Ruby so slow in this case? — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

Sure, Ruby, being interpreted, is slower than a compiled language.

12 messages 2001/05/05

[#14881] Class/Module Information — "John Kaurin" <jkaurin@...>

It is possible to modify the following code to produce

18 messages 2001/05/09

[#15034] Re: calling .inspect on array/hash causes core dump — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "A" == Andreas Riedl <viisi@chello.at> writes:

15 messages 2001/05/12

[#15198] Re: Q: GUI framework with direct drawing ca pabilities? — Steve Tuckner <SAT@...>

Would it be a good idea to develop a pure Ruby GUI framework built on top of

13 messages 2001/05/15

[#15234] Pluggable sorting - How would you do it? — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

Hello all,

16 messages 2001/05/16

[#15549] ColdFusion for Ruby — "Michael Dinowitz" <mdinowit@...2000.com>

I don't currently use Ruby. To tell the truth, I have no real reason to. I'd

12 messages 2001/05/22

[#15569] I like ruby-chan ... — Rob Armstrong <rob@...>

Ruby is more human(e) than Python. We already have too many animals :-).

15 messages 2001/05/23

[#15601] How to avoid spelling mistakes of variable names — ndrochak@... (Nick Drochak)

Since Ruby does not require a variable to be declared, do people find

13 messages 2001/05/23

[#15734] java based interpreter and regexes — "Wayne Blair" <wayne.blair@...>

I have been thinking about the java based ruby interpreter project, and I

48 messages 2001/05/25

[#15804] is it possible to dynamically coerce objects types in Ruby? — mirian@... (Mirian Crzig Lennox)

Greetings to all. I am a newcomer to Ruby and I am exploring the

13 messages 2001/05/27
[#15807] Re: is it possible to dynamically coerce objects types in Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/05/27

Hi,

[#15863] Experimental "in" operator for collections — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

There's one thing where I prefer Python over Ruby. Testing whether an

13 messages 2001/05/28

[#15925] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "M" == Mike <mike@lepton.fr> writes:

43 messages 2001/05/29
[#16070] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...> 2001/05/31

----- Original Message -----

[#16081] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/05/31

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:53:17AM +0900, Hal E. Fulton wrote:

[#16088] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — Dan Moniz <dnm@...> 2001/05/31

At 11:01 PM 5/31/2001 +0900, Sean Russell wrote:

[#15954] new keyword idea: tryreturn, tryturn or done — Juha Pohjalainen <voidjump@...>

Hello everyone!

12 messages 2001/05/29

[ruby-talk:14554] Re: Grace Hopper (was Ruby mascot)

From: Larry Elmore <ljelmore@...>
Date: 2001-05-02 22:10:09 UTC
List: ruby-talk #14554
jennyw wrote:
> 
> Just an aside ...
> 
> In 1952, the idea of a human readable computer language was pretty radical.
> Remember, Hopper had been around since the days they flipped physical
> switches to program computers (talk about machine language!). Dr. Hopper
> also started the first compiler standardization project when COBOL first
> came out. COBOL may be yucky now, but think about how Ruby (as it is today)
> might be regarded in 50 years.
> 
> Hopper has also been credited with coining the term 'bug' as it relates to
> computers: http://www.lewhill.com/firstcomputerbug.html. There are
> references that say she wasn't the one to remove the actual bug, but her
> telling of the story probably helped the term enter regular use.
> 
> Hopper was also known for showing students what a nano-second was by showing
> them a length of wire that electricity could pass through in a nanosecond.
> 
> There's a lot of myth and legend surrounding "Amazing Grace". It'd be
> unfortunate for us to sum up her contribution to computing as "COBOL --
> yuck!" (I'm not saying that Furio implied this; it's just that I'd hate for
> that to be an impression some people go away with).
> 
> Hopper felt her greatest achievement was teaching.  She's also served as
> inspiration to many programmers, especially women who wanted a role model.
> There's a conference named for her: http://gracehopper.org/

IIRC, The first incarnation of COBOL was literally a quick hack done in
a few months purely as an interim language until the "real" COBOL was
ready. Unfortunately, either the "real" COBOL never saw the light of day
or by the time it emerged from committee everyone was already committed
to the interim version and wanted compatibility with it, so it never got
used. I cannot remember the details, I'm afraid. 

Hopper also has an Aegis destroyer named after her. I'm not sure, but I
believe it's the first US Navy warship named after a woman.

Larry

In This Thread

Prev Next