[#14464] who uses Python or Ruby, and for what? — ellard2@...01.fas.harvard.edu (-11,3-3562,3-3076)

A while ago I posted a request for people to share their experiences

12 messages 2001/05/01

[#14555] Ruby as a Mac OS/X scripting language — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

10 messages 2001/05/02

[#14557] Arggg Bitten by the block var scope feature!!! — Wayne Scott <wscott@...>

13 messages 2001/05/02

[#14598] Re: Arggg Bitten by the block var scope feature!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

# On Thu, 3 May 2001, Wayne Scott wrote:

9 messages 2001/05/03

[#14636] Yet another "About private methods" question — Eric Jacoboni <jacoboni@...2.fr>

I'm still trying to figure out the semantics of private methods in Ruby.

39 messages 2001/05/04
[#14656] Re: Yet another "About private methods" question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/05/04

Eric Jacoboni <jaco@teaser.fr> writes:

[#14666] Ruby and Web Applications — "Chris Montgomery" <monty@...> 2001/05/04

Greetings from a newbie,

[#14772] Re: Ruby and Web Applications — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/05/07

On Sat, 5 May 2001, Chris Montgomery wrote:

[#14710] Why's Ruby so slow in this case? — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

Sure, Ruby, being interpreted, is slower than a compiled language.

12 messages 2001/05/05

[#14881] Class/Module Information — "John Kaurin" <jkaurin@...>

It is possible to modify the following code to produce

18 messages 2001/05/09

[#15034] Re: calling .inspect on array/hash causes core dump — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "A" == Andreas Riedl <viisi@chello.at> writes:

15 messages 2001/05/12

[#15198] Re: Q: GUI framework with direct drawing ca pabilities? — Steve Tuckner <SAT@...>

Would it be a good idea to develop a pure Ruby GUI framework built on top of

13 messages 2001/05/15

[#15234] Pluggable sorting - How would you do it? — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

Hello all,

16 messages 2001/05/16

[#15549] ColdFusion for Ruby — "Michael Dinowitz" <mdinowit@...2000.com>

I don't currently use Ruby. To tell the truth, I have no real reason to. I'd

12 messages 2001/05/22

[#15569] I like ruby-chan ... — Rob Armstrong <rob@...>

Ruby is more human(e) than Python. We already have too many animals :-).

15 messages 2001/05/23

[#15601] How to avoid spelling mistakes of variable names — ndrochak@... (Nick Drochak)

Since Ruby does not require a variable to be declared, do people find

13 messages 2001/05/23

[#15734] java based interpreter and regexes — "Wayne Blair" <wayne.blair@...>

I have been thinking about the java based ruby interpreter project, and I

48 messages 2001/05/25

[#15804] is it possible to dynamically coerce objects types in Ruby? — mirian@... (Mirian Crzig Lennox)

Greetings to all. I am a newcomer to Ruby and I am exploring the

13 messages 2001/05/27
[#15807] Re: is it possible to dynamically coerce objects types in Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/05/27

Hi,

[#15863] Experimental "in" operator for collections — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

There's one thing where I prefer Python over Ruby. Testing whether an

13 messages 2001/05/28

[#15925] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "M" == Mike <mike@lepton.fr> writes:

43 messages 2001/05/29
[#16070] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...> 2001/05/31

----- Original Message -----

[#16081] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/05/31

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:53:17AM +0900, Hal E. Fulton wrote:

[#16088] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — Dan Moniz <dnm@...> 2001/05/31

At 11:01 PM 5/31/2001 +0900, Sean Russell wrote:

[#15954] new keyword idea: tryreturn, tryturn or done — Juha Pohjalainen <voidjump@...>

Hello everyone!

12 messages 2001/05/29

[ruby-talk:16047] Re: java based interpreter and regexes

From: "Wayne Blair" <wayne.blair@...>
Date: 2001-05-30 18:41:24 UTC
List: ruby-talk #16047
> I've recently joined this list, so please forgive me if I've missed
> something which has been hashed out before, but it's hard for me to
> see how Ruby can fit into how a JVM treats classes.  In a JVM, classes
> are static entities, once they are loaded their definitions cannot be
> changed.  But Ruby permits continual modifications to the definition
> of a class which affect even previously existing object of that class.
> How could this limitation in the JVM be dealt with?
>
> --Mirian
>

In my interpretation each ruby class would be an instance in java (say
RubyClass) and it's methods would be pluggable.  Each class object would act
as an instance factory for instances, which would also be able to plug
attributes and behaviors (as singletons).  I assume that's how it's
basically done in the
C version, but feel free to kill me for not reading the source before
responding here.  Pseudocode to illustrate only this point:

public class RubyClass  // just showing methods pretending all are public to
keep this simple
{   private RubyMethodFactory methodFactory;
    private RubyClass superclass;
    private String name;

    public RubyObject new(RubyObject[] args)
    {  return new RubyObject(args);
    }

    public RubyObject evaluate(String message, RubyObject[] args)
    {  RubyMethod method = methodFactory.get(message);
       if (method == null)
       {  if (superclass == null)
           {  return RUBY_NIL;  // or throw exception
           }
           return superclass.evaluate(message, args);
       }
       return method.call(args);
    }

    public void addMethod(RubyMethod method)
    {  methodFactory.add(method);
    }
}

public class RubyObject
{   private RubyClass class;
    private RubyMethodFactory methodFactory;

    RubyObject(RubyObject[] args)
    {  evaluate("initialize", args);
    }

    public RubyObject evaluate(String message, RubyObject[] args)
    {  RubyMethod method = methodFactory.get(message);
       if (method == null)
       {  if (class == null) return RUBY_NIL;
          return class.evaluate(message, args);
       }
       return method.call(args);
    }

    public void addMethod(RubyMethod method)
    {  methodFactory.add(method);
    }
}

Wayne


In This Thread