[#14464] who uses Python or Ruby, and for what? — ellard2@...01.fas.harvard.edu (-11,3-3562,3-3076)

A while ago I posted a request for people to share their experiences

12 messages 2001/05/01

[#14555] Ruby as a Mac OS/X scripting language — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

10 messages 2001/05/02

[#14557] Arggg Bitten by the block var scope feature!!! — Wayne Scott <wscott@...>

13 messages 2001/05/02

[#14598] Re: Arggg Bitten by the block var scope feature!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

# On Thu, 3 May 2001, Wayne Scott wrote:

9 messages 2001/05/03

[#14636] Yet another "About private methods" question — Eric Jacoboni <jacoboni@...2.fr>

I'm still trying to figure out the semantics of private methods in Ruby.

39 messages 2001/05/04
[#14656] Re: Yet another "About private methods" question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/05/04

Eric Jacoboni <jaco@teaser.fr> writes:

[#14666] Ruby and Web Applications — "Chris Montgomery" <monty@...> 2001/05/04

Greetings from a newbie,

[#14772] Re: Ruby and Web Applications — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/05/07

On Sat, 5 May 2001, Chris Montgomery wrote:

[#14710] Why's Ruby so slow in this case? — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

Sure, Ruby, being interpreted, is slower than a compiled language.

12 messages 2001/05/05

[#14881] Class/Module Information — "John Kaurin" <jkaurin@...>

It is possible to modify the following code to produce

18 messages 2001/05/09

[#15034] Re: calling .inspect on array/hash causes core dump — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "A" == Andreas Riedl <viisi@chello.at> writes:

15 messages 2001/05/12

[#15198] Re: Q: GUI framework with direct drawing ca pabilities? — Steve Tuckner <SAT@...>

Would it be a good idea to develop a pure Ruby GUI framework built on top of

13 messages 2001/05/15

[#15234] Pluggable sorting - How would you do it? — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

Hello all,

16 messages 2001/05/16

[#15549] ColdFusion for Ruby — "Michael Dinowitz" <mdinowit@...2000.com>

I don't currently use Ruby. To tell the truth, I have no real reason to. I'd

12 messages 2001/05/22

[#15569] I like ruby-chan ... — Rob Armstrong <rob@...>

Ruby is more human(e) than Python. We already have too many animals :-).

15 messages 2001/05/23

[#15601] How to avoid spelling mistakes of variable names — ndrochak@... (Nick Drochak)

Since Ruby does not require a variable to be declared, do people find

13 messages 2001/05/23

[#15734] java based interpreter and regexes — "Wayne Blair" <wayne.blair@...>

I have been thinking about the java based ruby interpreter project, and I

48 messages 2001/05/25

[#15804] is it possible to dynamically coerce objects types in Ruby? — mirian@... (Mirian Crzig Lennox)

Greetings to all. I am a newcomer to Ruby and I am exploring the

13 messages 2001/05/27
[#15807] Re: is it possible to dynamically coerce objects types in Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/05/27

Hi,

[#15863] Experimental "in" operator for collections — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

There's one thing where I prefer Python over Ruby. Testing whether an

13 messages 2001/05/28

[#15925] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "M" == Mike <mike@lepton.fr> writes:

43 messages 2001/05/29
[#16070] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...> 2001/05/31

----- Original Message -----

[#16081] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/05/31

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:53:17AM +0900, Hal E. Fulton wrote:

[#16088] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — Dan Moniz <dnm@...> 2001/05/31

At 11:01 PM 5/31/2001 +0900, Sean Russell wrote:

[#15954] new keyword idea: tryreturn, tryturn or done — Juha Pohjalainen <voidjump@...>

Hello everyone!

12 messages 2001/05/29

[ruby-talk:15899] Operable module

From: mirian@... (Mirian Crzig Lennox)
Date: 2001-05-28 22:26:53 UTC
List: ruby-talk #15899
So, I took a stab at implementing a module for classes which want to 
emulate numerical types.  And eventually I decided that due to Ruby's
dynamic typing, it is possible to be completely general in this 
implementation.  So, I wrote an "Operable" module.

Any class which imports "Operable" must define a method called "lhs".
This will return its value when used as the left-hand side of an
operator expression.  That way, it is easy to make any class usable
in expressions by default:

module Operable
  def [](idx); lhs[idx]; end
  def []=(idx,rhs); lhs[idx]=rhs; end
  def **; rhs ** lhs; end
  def ~; ~lhs; end
  def +@; +lhs; end
  def -@; -lhs; end
  def +(rhs); lhs + rhs; end
  def -(rhs); lhs - rhs; end
  def *(rhs); lhs * rhs; end
  def /(rhs); lhs / rhs; end
  def %(rhs); lhs % rhs; end
  def >>(rhs); lhs >> rhs; end
  def <<(rhs); lhs << rhs; end
  def &(rhs); lhs & rhs; end
  def ^(rhs); lhs ^ rhs; end
  def |(rhs); lhs | rhs; end
  def <=(rhs); lhs <= rhs; end
  def <(rhs); lhs < rhs; end
  def >(rhs); lhs > rhs; end
  def >=(rhs); lhs >= rhs; end
  def <=>(rhs); lhs <=> rhs; end
  def ==(rhs); lhs == rhs; end
  def ===(rhs); lhs === rhs; end
  def =~(rhs); lhs =~ rhs; end
end

Additionally, I wrote another module called "Integerlike" (I couldn't
think of a better name for it), which extends Operable to be
specifically Integerlike by calling the class's to_int method:

module Integerlike
  include Operable
  def lhs; to_int; end
end

My eventual goal is to end up with a module which can be imported into
any class in order to make that class work like a built-in type
(probably will eventually be one module for each of integer, string,
etc.).  Any feedback is welcome.

--Mirian

In This Thread

Prev Next