From: Mike <mike@...>
Date: 2001-05-28T22:25:44+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:15866] Re: Experimental "in" operator for collections

On Mon, 28 May 2001 21:40:04 +0900
Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de> wrote:

> There's one thing where I prefer Python over Ruby.  Testing whether an
> object is included in some collection happens so often, that a special
> syntax just looks better.
> 
> Just to test how Ruby would feel like, I modified the system to allow 
> 
>   object in array
> 

What about:
	object.in? array


You can do this in pure ruby:

class Object
	def in?(array)
		array.include? self
	end
end


Mike.