[#14464] who uses Python or Ruby, and for what? — ellard2@...01.fas.harvard.edu (-11,3-3562,3-3076)

A while ago I posted a request for people to share their experiences

12 messages 2001/05/01

[#14555] Ruby as a Mac OS/X scripting language — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

10 messages 2001/05/02

[#14557] Arggg Bitten by the block var scope feature!!! — Wayne Scott <wscott@...>

13 messages 2001/05/02

[#14598] Re: Arggg Bitten by the block var scope feature!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

# On Thu, 3 May 2001, Wayne Scott wrote:

9 messages 2001/05/03

[#14636] Yet another "About private methods" question — Eric Jacoboni <jacoboni@...2.fr>

I'm still trying to figure out the semantics of private methods in Ruby.

39 messages 2001/05/04
[#14656] Re: Yet another "About private methods" question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/05/04

Eric Jacoboni <jaco@teaser.fr> writes:

[#14666] Ruby and Web Applications — "Chris Montgomery" <monty@...> 2001/05/04

Greetings from a newbie,

[#14772] Re: Ruby and Web Applications — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/05/07

On Sat, 5 May 2001, Chris Montgomery wrote:

[#14710] Why's Ruby so slow in this case? — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

Sure, Ruby, being interpreted, is slower than a compiled language.

12 messages 2001/05/05

[#14881] Class/Module Information — "John Kaurin" <jkaurin@...>

It is possible to modify the following code to produce

18 messages 2001/05/09

[#15034] Re: calling .inspect on array/hash causes core dump — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "A" == Andreas Riedl <viisi@chello.at> writes:

15 messages 2001/05/12

[#15198] Re: Q: GUI framework with direct drawing ca pabilities? — Steve Tuckner <SAT@...>

Would it be a good idea to develop a pure Ruby GUI framework built on top of

13 messages 2001/05/15

[#15234] Pluggable sorting - How would you do it? — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

Hello all,

16 messages 2001/05/16

[#15549] ColdFusion for Ruby — "Michael Dinowitz" <mdinowit@...2000.com>

I don't currently use Ruby. To tell the truth, I have no real reason to. I'd

12 messages 2001/05/22

[#15569] I like ruby-chan ... — Rob Armstrong <rob@...>

Ruby is more human(e) than Python. We already have too many animals :-).

15 messages 2001/05/23

[#15601] How to avoid spelling mistakes of variable names — ndrochak@... (Nick Drochak)

Since Ruby does not require a variable to be declared, do people find

13 messages 2001/05/23

[#15734] java based interpreter and regexes — "Wayne Blair" <wayne.blair@...>

I have been thinking about the java based ruby interpreter project, and I

48 messages 2001/05/25

[#15804] is it possible to dynamically coerce objects types in Ruby? — mirian@... (Mirian Crzig Lennox)

Greetings to all. I am a newcomer to Ruby and I am exploring the

13 messages 2001/05/27
[#15807] Re: is it possible to dynamically coerce objects types in Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/05/27

Hi,

[#15863] Experimental "in" operator for collections — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

There's one thing where I prefer Python over Ruby. Testing whether an

13 messages 2001/05/28

[#15925] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "M" == Mike <mike@lepton.fr> writes:

43 messages 2001/05/29
[#16070] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...> 2001/05/31

----- Original Message -----

[#16081] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/05/31

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:53:17AM +0900, Hal E. Fulton wrote:

[#16088] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — Dan Moniz <dnm@...> 2001/05/31

At 11:01 PM 5/31/2001 +0900, Sean Russell wrote:

[#15954] new keyword idea: tryreturn, tryturn or done — Juha Pohjalainen <voidjump@...>

Hello everyone!

12 messages 2001/05/29

[ruby-talk:15842] Re: java based interpreter and regexes

From: "Benoit Cerrina" <benoit.cerrina@...>
Date: 2001-05-28 08:40:06 UTC
List: ruby-talk #15842
>
> Java is performing 28 GCs while running the benchmark (spending some
> 60 ms in GC), reducing the heap each time by 500 KB.  This means, if I
> understand the statistics, the benchmark is generating and throwing
> away objects worth of 14 MB.  I'd guess that's some 300.000 objects.
>
> So don't assume there're no objects involved :-)
>
How did you get those results, I used both -Xloggc:log.gc and
later -verbose:gc to
no avail.
Benoit
PS
attached you'll find the test I used , this is just the original java bench
adapted too the
new regex package.


begin 666 regtest.java
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-*"D["@D)?0H)?0I]"@``
`
end

In This Thread