[#14464] who uses Python or Ruby, and for what? — ellard2@...01.fas.harvard.edu (-11,3-3562,3-3076)

A while ago I posted a request for people to share their experiences

12 messages 2001/05/01

[#14555] Ruby as a Mac OS/X scripting language — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

10 messages 2001/05/02

[#14557] Arggg Bitten by the block var scope feature!!! — Wayne Scott <wscott@...>

13 messages 2001/05/02

[#14598] Re: Arggg Bitten by the block var scope feature!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

# On Thu, 3 May 2001, Wayne Scott wrote:

9 messages 2001/05/03

[#14636] Yet another "About private methods" question — Eric Jacoboni <jacoboni@...2.fr>

I'm still trying to figure out the semantics of private methods in Ruby.

39 messages 2001/05/04
[#14656] Re: Yet another "About private methods" question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/05/04

Eric Jacoboni <jaco@teaser.fr> writes:

[#14666] Ruby and Web Applications — "Chris Montgomery" <monty@...> 2001/05/04

Greetings from a newbie,

[#14772] Re: Ruby and Web Applications — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/05/07

On Sat, 5 May 2001, Chris Montgomery wrote:

[#14710] Why's Ruby so slow in this case? — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

Sure, Ruby, being interpreted, is slower than a compiled language.

12 messages 2001/05/05

[#14881] Class/Module Information — "John Kaurin" <jkaurin@...>

It is possible to modify the following code to produce

18 messages 2001/05/09

[#15034] Re: calling .inspect on array/hash causes core dump — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "A" == Andreas Riedl <viisi@chello.at> writes:

15 messages 2001/05/12

[#15198] Re: Q: GUI framework with direct drawing ca pabilities? — Steve Tuckner <SAT@...>

Would it be a good idea to develop a pure Ruby GUI framework built on top of

13 messages 2001/05/15

[#15234] Pluggable sorting - How would you do it? — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

Hello all,

16 messages 2001/05/16

[#15549] ColdFusion for Ruby — "Michael Dinowitz" <mdinowit@...2000.com>

I don't currently use Ruby. To tell the truth, I have no real reason to. I'd

12 messages 2001/05/22

[#15569] I like ruby-chan ... — Rob Armstrong <rob@...>

Ruby is more human(e) than Python. We already have too many animals :-).

15 messages 2001/05/23

[#15601] How to avoid spelling mistakes of variable names — ndrochak@... (Nick Drochak)

Since Ruby does not require a variable to be declared, do people find

13 messages 2001/05/23

[#15734] java based interpreter and regexes — "Wayne Blair" <wayne.blair@...>

I have been thinking about the java based ruby interpreter project, and I

48 messages 2001/05/25

[#15804] is it possible to dynamically coerce objects types in Ruby? — mirian@... (Mirian Crzig Lennox)

Greetings to all. I am a newcomer to Ruby and I am exploring the

13 messages 2001/05/27
[#15807] Re: is it possible to dynamically coerce objects types in Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/05/27

Hi,

[#15863] Experimental "in" operator for collections — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

There's one thing where I prefer Python over Ruby. Testing whether an

13 messages 2001/05/28

[#15925] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "M" == Mike <mike@lepton.fr> writes:

43 messages 2001/05/29
[#16070] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...> 2001/05/31

----- Original Message -----

[#16081] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/05/31

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:53:17AM +0900, Hal E. Fulton wrote:

[#16088] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — Dan Moniz <dnm@...> 2001/05/31

At 11:01 PM 5/31/2001 +0900, Sean Russell wrote:

[#15954] new keyword idea: tryreturn, tryturn or done — Juha Pohjalainen <voidjump@...>

Hello everyone!

12 messages 2001/05/29

[ruby-talk:14786] Re: SimpleDelegator assymetry

From: Wyss Clemens <WYS@...>
Date: 2001-05-07 16:08:59 UTC
List: ruby-talk #14786
> -----Ursprgliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Dave Thomas [mailto:Dave@PragmaticProgrammer.com]
> Gesendet am: Montag, 7. Mai 2001 17:39
> An: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org; ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp
> Betreff: [ruby-talk:14784] Re: AW: Re: SimpleDelegator assymetry
> 
> Wyss Clemens <WYS@helbling.ch> writes:
> 
> > I have a somewhat "not so fast solution" ;-):
> 
> This will have a different behavior to the original delegate.rb. This
> code will not delegate a method that already exists in the delegating
> class, while the original will.

Robert, looks like this was meant by the comment in delegate.rb!

> Which is correct is yet to be determined :)
> 

But as Dave says, the question remains which of the behaviors is correct!
Below (not tested though) find a (possibly) more generic approach. 
No subclassing needed, as this is a "wrapper approach"!

class SimpleDelegatorBase
  def initialize(original_obj, delegatee = nil)
    @__originial_obj = original_obj
    @__delegatee = delegatee
  end

  def __setobj__(object)
    @__delegatee = object
  end

  def method_missing(method, *args)
    receivers().each { | receiver |
      safley_send(receiver, method, args)
    }
  end  

  def safely_send(receiver, method, *args)
    if receiver.respond_to?(method) then
      if args.size() == 0 then
        receiver.send(method)
      else
        receiver.send(method, args)
      end
    end
  end

  def receivers()
    [@__original_obj]
  end
end

class SimpleDelegatorOriginalPrecedence < SimpleDelegatorBase
  # special behavior here ("either-or")
  def method_missing(method, *args)
    if @__originial_obj.respond_to?(method) then
      safley_send(@__originial_obj, method, args)
    else
      safely_send(@__delegatee, method, args)
    end
  end
end

class SimpleDelegatorSubstitute < SimpleDelegatorBase
  def receivers()
    [@__delegatee]
  end  
end

class SimpleDelegatorPreCall < SimpleDelegatorBase
  def receivers()
    [@__delegatee, @__original_obj]
  end  
end

class SimpleDelegatorPostCall < SimpleDelegatorBase
  def receivers()
    [@__original_obj, @__delegatee]
  end  
end

;-)
Clemens

In This Thread

Prev Next