[#14464] who uses Python or Ruby, and for what? — ellard2@...01.fas.harvard.edu (-11,3-3562,3-3076)

A while ago I posted a request for people to share their experiences

12 messages 2001/05/01

[#14555] Ruby as a Mac OS/X scripting language — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

10 messages 2001/05/02

[#14557] Arggg Bitten by the block var scope feature!!! — Wayne Scott <wscott@...>

13 messages 2001/05/02

[#14598] Re: Arggg Bitten by the block var scope feature!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

# On Thu, 3 May 2001, Wayne Scott wrote:

9 messages 2001/05/03

[#14636] Yet another "About private methods" question — Eric Jacoboni <jacoboni@...2.fr>

I'm still trying to figure out the semantics of private methods in Ruby.

39 messages 2001/05/04
[#14656] Re: Yet another "About private methods" question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/05/04

Eric Jacoboni <jaco@teaser.fr> writes:

[#14666] Ruby and Web Applications — "Chris Montgomery" <monty@...> 2001/05/04

Greetings from a newbie,

[#14772] Re: Ruby and Web Applications — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/05/07

On Sat, 5 May 2001, Chris Montgomery wrote:

[#14710] Why's Ruby so slow in this case? — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

Sure, Ruby, being interpreted, is slower than a compiled language.

12 messages 2001/05/05

[#14881] Class/Module Information — "John Kaurin" <jkaurin@...>

It is possible to modify the following code to produce

18 messages 2001/05/09

[#15034] Re: calling .inspect on array/hash causes core dump — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "A" == Andreas Riedl <viisi@chello.at> writes:

15 messages 2001/05/12

[#15198] Re: Q: GUI framework with direct drawing ca pabilities? — Steve Tuckner <SAT@...>

Would it be a good idea to develop a pure Ruby GUI framework built on top of

13 messages 2001/05/15

[#15234] Pluggable sorting - How would you do it? — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

Hello all,

16 messages 2001/05/16

[#15549] ColdFusion for Ruby — "Michael Dinowitz" <mdinowit@...2000.com>

I don't currently use Ruby. To tell the truth, I have no real reason to. I'd

12 messages 2001/05/22

[#15569] I like ruby-chan ... — Rob Armstrong <rob@...>

Ruby is more human(e) than Python. We already have too many animals :-).

15 messages 2001/05/23

[#15601] How to avoid spelling mistakes of variable names — ndrochak@... (Nick Drochak)

Since Ruby does not require a variable to be declared, do people find

13 messages 2001/05/23

[#15734] java based interpreter and regexes — "Wayne Blair" <wayne.blair@...>

I have been thinking about the java based ruby interpreter project, and I

48 messages 2001/05/25

[#15804] is it possible to dynamically coerce objects types in Ruby? — mirian@... (Mirian Crzig Lennox)

Greetings to all. I am a newcomer to Ruby and I am exploring the

13 messages 2001/05/27
[#15807] Re: is it possible to dynamically coerce objects types in Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/05/27

Hi,

[#15863] Experimental "in" operator for collections — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

There's one thing where I prefer Python over Ruby. Testing whether an

13 messages 2001/05/28

[#15925] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "M" == Mike <mike@lepton.fr> writes:

43 messages 2001/05/29
[#16070] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...> 2001/05/31

----- Original Message -----

[#16081] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/05/31

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:53:17AM +0900, Hal E. Fulton wrote:

[#16088] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — Dan Moniz <dnm@...> 2001/05/31

At 11:01 PM 5/31/2001 +0900, Sean Russell wrote:

[#15954] new keyword idea: tryreturn, tryturn or done — Juha Pohjalainen <voidjump@...>

Hello everyone!

12 messages 2001/05/29

[ruby-talk:15176] Handling undefined methods gracefully

From: Jamis Buck <jgb3@...>
Date: 2001-05-15 16:33:04 UTC
List: ruby-talk #15176
In Python, there is a pretty graceful way to specify a generic routine
to handle requests for attributes/methods that do not exist in an
object.  Is there a similar feature in Ruby?

For example, if I have a simple class:

class MySimpleClass
  def initialize
    @attrs = Hash.new
  end

  def []( name )
    @attrs[ name.downcase ]
  end

  def []=( name, value )
    @attrs[ name.downcase ] = value
  end
end


This (admittedly poor) example really just duplicates the functionality
of Hash table, but in a case-insensitive manner.

Now, the following code works great:

test = MySimpleClass.new
test[ 'Name' ] = "Jamis"
puts test[ 'name' ]

But what if I want to treat each new entry in the hash as an actual
attribute of the object (though internally continuing to use the hash
table to store and query the values), as follows:

test = MySimpleClass.new
test.name = "Jamis"
puts test.name

Using 'eval' I'm sure I could come up with something, but all the
scenarios I've thought of would be case-sensitive, and I would like to
find a way to do it such that 'name', 'Name', 'NAME', 'NaMe', etc. all
map to the same attribute, as is the case in the example above that uses
the [] method.

I hope I'm being clear here.  Is there a way to do this in Ruby, without
modifying the Ruby source code?  (Incidentally, I've already modified my
local copy of Ruby to support this, as an exercise...  but if there is
already support for this, that would naturally be preferable.)

Thanks for your help,

Jamis

-- 
Jamis Buck
minam@rpgplanet.com
http://www.rpgplanet.com/dnd3e/generators

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d+(-) s:(-:-) a- C++$ U$ P+ L++$ E- W++$ o>++ K? w++ !O !M PS-(--)
!V PE+ Y+ !PGP t+@ 5- X-@ R+>$ tv--@ b++ DI+(++) D--@ G e++ h--- r+++ 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

In This Thread

Prev Next