From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2001-05-19T13:08:42+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:15388] Re: Bug in time.c (was Time.times problems)

Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:15387] Re: Bug in time.c (was Time.times problems)"
    on 01/05/19, Dave Thomas <Dave@PragmaticProgrammer.com> writes:

|That's strange. On both my boxes, the man page doesn't mention an
|error for either function. However, if the buffer address is bad, they
|do indeed return EFAULT. So I retract the bug in Ruby, and claim a bug
|in my man pages :)

I'm confusing why starange behavior had happened for Guy's program.
In Ruby's source code, no bad address is given to times(2), so that if
EFAULT is the only error for times(2), I can just ignore error code.

							matz.