[#14464] who uses Python or Ruby, and for what? — ellard2@...01.fas.harvard.edu (-11,3-3562,3-3076)

A while ago I posted a request for people to share their experiences

12 messages 2001/05/01

[#14555] Ruby as a Mac OS/X scripting language — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

10 messages 2001/05/02

[#14557] Arggg Bitten by the block var scope feature!!! — Wayne Scott <wscott@...>

13 messages 2001/05/02

[#14598] Re: Arggg Bitten by the block var scope feature!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

# On Thu, 3 May 2001, Wayne Scott wrote:

9 messages 2001/05/03

[#14636] Yet another "About private methods" question — Eric Jacoboni <jacoboni@...2.fr>

I'm still trying to figure out the semantics of private methods in Ruby.

39 messages 2001/05/04
[#14656] Re: Yet another "About private methods" question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/05/04

Eric Jacoboni <jaco@teaser.fr> writes:

[#14666] Ruby and Web Applications — "Chris Montgomery" <monty@...> 2001/05/04

Greetings from a newbie,

[#14772] Re: Ruby and Web Applications — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/05/07

On Sat, 5 May 2001, Chris Montgomery wrote:

[#14710] Why's Ruby so slow in this case? — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

Sure, Ruby, being interpreted, is slower than a compiled language.

12 messages 2001/05/05

[#14881] Class/Module Information — "John Kaurin" <jkaurin@...>

It is possible to modify the following code to produce

18 messages 2001/05/09

[#15034] Re: calling .inspect on array/hash causes core dump — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "A" == Andreas Riedl <viisi@chello.at> writes:

15 messages 2001/05/12

[#15198] Re: Q: GUI framework with direct drawing ca pabilities? — Steve Tuckner <SAT@...>

Would it be a good idea to develop a pure Ruby GUI framework built on top of

13 messages 2001/05/15

[#15234] Pluggable sorting - How would you do it? — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

Hello all,

16 messages 2001/05/16

[#15549] ColdFusion for Ruby — "Michael Dinowitz" <mdinowit@...2000.com>

I don't currently use Ruby. To tell the truth, I have no real reason to. I'd

12 messages 2001/05/22

[#15569] I like ruby-chan ... — Rob Armstrong <rob@...>

Ruby is more human(e) than Python. We already have too many animals :-).

15 messages 2001/05/23

[#15601] How to avoid spelling mistakes of variable names — ndrochak@... (Nick Drochak)

Since Ruby does not require a variable to be declared, do people find

13 messages 2001/05/23

[#15734] java based interpreter and regexes — "Wayne Blair" <wayne.blair@...>

I have been thinking about the java based ruby interpreter project, and I

48 messages 2001/05/25

[#15804] is it possible to dynamically coerce objects types in Ruby? — mirian@... (Mirian Crzig Lennox)

Greetings to all. I am a newcomer to Ruby and I am exploring the

13 messages 2001/05/27
[#15807] Re: is it possible to dynamically coerce objects types in Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/05/27

Hi,

[#15863] Experimental "in" operator for collections — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

There's one thing where I prefer Python over Ruby. Testing whether an

13 messages 2001/05/28

[#15925] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "M" == Mike <mike@lepton.fr> writes:

43 messages 2001/05/29
[#16070] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...> 2001/05/31

----- Original Message -----

[#16081] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/05/31

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:53:17AM +0900, Hal E. Fulton wrote:

[#16088] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — Dan Moniz <dnm@...> 2001/05/31

At 11:01 PM 5/31/2001 +0900, Sean Russell wrote:

[#15954] new keyword idea: tryreturn, tryturn or done — Juha Pohjalainen <voidjump@...>

Hello everyone!

12 messages 2001/05/29

[ruby-talk:15299] Q: Should initializers validate arguments ?

From: Robert Kedoin <robert@...>
Date: 2001-05-16 16:44:06 UTC
List: ruby-talk #15299
I'm new to Ruby and I came across something today and I was wondering if 
it's a bug or a philosophical issue.

In Ruby 1.6.3, it is possible to create a Range object with two Time 
object's as start and end. However, since Time does not respond to 
#succ, when you try to send most methods to the Range you fail since 
#each cannot work.

I would have expected that I would have gotten some sort of exception 
when I created the Range.

Similarly, it is possible to create a Range with a start and and end 
that are of completely different classes. Again this doesn't generate 
any error at creation time, but fails to do anything meaningful later.

Is it a design decision not to check the fitness of these arguments and 
wait until later to find out if the Range is valid. Or are they bugs ?

Below is some code that demonstrates what I'm talking about.

Robert Kedoin

p.s I've since found the Date class which did what I wanted, but I was 
still confused about the behavior I was seeing...
	-Rob

--- cut here ---
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
#
# experiment with using Time in a range
require 'date'

thisYear = Time.now.year

now = Time.now
today = Time.local(now.year,now.month,now.day)

# Create a range of Time's for the month of May
puts "Creating a range of Time"
may = Time.local(thisYear,5,1)..Time.local(thisYear,5,30)
#-> I would have expected an error here since Time doesn't support #succ

begin
#  puts "range length is #{may.length}"
   puts may.include?(today)
rescue NameError
   $stderr.puts "Range operation failed:" + $!
end

# Simlarly it is possible to create a range with two completely unrelated
# classes
puts "\nCreating a range from Date to Fixnum"
may = Date.new(thisYear,5,1)..5

#-> I would have expected an error here since although Date and Fixnum 
support
# #succ, it probably isn't meaningful to count from one to the other
puts may.to_a
puts "Range length is #{may.length}"

# Interestingly enough, reversing the Fixnum and Date *does* generate an
# error when creating the Range
puts "\nCreating a range from Fixnum to Date"
may = 5..Date.new(thisYear,5,1)




In This Thread

Prev Next