[#14464] who uses Python or Ruby, and for what? — ellard2@...01.fas.harvard.edu (-11,3-3562,3-3076)

A while ago I posted a request for people to share their experiences

12 messages 2001/05/01

[#14555] Ruby as a Mac OS/X scripting language — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

10 messages 2001/05/02

[#14557] Arggg Bitten by the block var scope feature!!! — Wayne Scott <wscott@...>

13 messages 2001/05/02

[#14598] Re: Arggg Bitten by the block var scope feature!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

# On Thu, 3 May 2001, Wayne Scott wrote:

9 messages 2001/05/03

[#14636] Yet another "About private methods" question — Eric Jacoboni <jacoboni@...2.fr>

I'm still trying to figure out the semantics of private methods in Ruby.

39 messages 2001/05/04
[#14656] Re: Yet another "About private methods" question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/05/04

Eric Jacoboni <jaco@teaser.fr> writes:

[#14666] Ruby and Web Applications — "Chris Montgomery" <monty@...> 2001/05/04

Greetings from a newbie,

[#14772] Re: Ruby and Web Applications — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/05/07

On Sat, 5 May 2001, Chris Montgomery wrote:

[#14710] Why's Ruby so slow in this case? — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

Sure, Ruby, being interpreted, is slower than a compiled language.

12 messages 2001/05/05

[#14881] Class/Module Information — "John Kaurin" <jkaurin@...>

It is possible to modify the following code to produce

18 messages 2001/05/09

[#15034] Re: calling .inspect on array/hash causes core dump — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "A" == Andreas Riedl <viisi@chello.at> writes:

15 messages 2001/05/12

[#15198] Re: Q: GUI framework with direct drawing ca pabilities? — Steve Tuckner <SAT@...>

Would it be a good idea to develop a pure Ruby GUI framework built on top of

13 messages 2001/05/15

[#15234] Pluggable sorting - How would you do it? — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

Hello all,

16 messages 2001/05/16

[#15549] ColdFusion for Ruby — "Michael Dinowitz" <mdinowit@...2000.com>

I don't currently use Ruby. To tell the truth, I have no real reason to. I'd

12 messages 2001/05/22

[#15569] I like ruby-chan ... — Rob Armstrong <rob@...>

Ruby is more human(e) than Python. We already have too many animals :-).

15 messages 2001/05/23

[#15601] How to avoid spelling mistakes of variable names — ndrochak@... (Nick Drochak)

Since Ruby does not require a variable to be declared, do people find

13 messages 2001/05/23

[#15734] java based interpreter and regexes — "Wayne Blair" <wayne.blair@...>

I have been thinking about the java based ruby interpreter project, and I

48 messages 2001/05/25

[#15804] is it possible to dynamically coerce objects types in Ruby? — mirian@... (Mirian Crzig Lennox)

Greetings to all. I am a newcomer to Ruby and I am exploring the

13 messages 2001/05/27
[#15807] Re: is it possible to dynamically coerce objects types in Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/05/27

Hi,

[#15863] Experimental "in" operator for collections — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

There's one thing where I prefer Python over Ruby. Testing whether an

13 messages 2001/05/28

[#15925] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "M" == Mike <mike@lepton.fr> writes:

43 messages 2001/05/29
[#16070] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...> 2001/05/31

----- Original Message -----

[#16081] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/05/31

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:53:17AM +0900, Hal E. Fulton wrote:

[#16088] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — Dan Moniz <dnm@...> 2001/05/31

At 11:01 PM 5/31/2001 +0900, Sean Russell wrote:

[#15954] new keyword idea: tryreturn, tryturn or done — Juha Pohjalainen <voidjump@...>

Hello everyone!

12 messages 2001/05/29

[ruby-talk:16066] Re: tryreturn - names and intentions

From: "J J" <jj5412@...>
Date: 2001-05-31 00:41:24 UTC
List: ruby-talk #16066
How about:

def getAValue
  result = methodOne || methodTwo || methodThree
  return result
end

Routines are called in seqeunce until a non-nil result is returned.

As for try____, if it works for you, by all means use it. That's one of the
great things about Ruby, it's malleability.

Regards,
  JJ

--
Be Kind, Be Careful, Be Yourself
--
Solid, reliable software at reasonable prices
http://www.johnjohnsonsoftware.com


"Juha Pohjalainen" <voidjump@nic.fi> wrote in message
news:20010530101528.E15296@lanfear.nic.fi...
> Hiya all again! :-)
>
> As I'm not explaining things or naming things, here is some more
> thougths about "try return" like things.
>
> My original hate of if-then-return comes from code like:
> | result = doTheFooThing
> | if result
> |   return result
> | end
>
> I know, I know; there are shorter versions to do the same thing,
> but that is code I originally used, because I think that:
>  a) variable names should be meaningful words, not just i,j,r or t
>  b) code should be "bug revealing" [bugs can be real bugs or just
>     flaws in thinking]
>  c) coming from VC++ debugging background
>
> Now, after doing that kind of code thousand times (in C++, Java and
> Python; and lately in Ruby; newbie alert - defector) I just thought
> one language could make a difference.
>
> Enter "try-return" names
>
> | tryreturn doTheFooThing
> was my first working name for idea; it tries to to state intention
> "try to return, if that return is meaningful"
>
> | tryturn doTheFooThing
> was my shorter version; really bad one, do not use it; bad bad bad;
> it does not state intention or is not even a word (I think?)
>
> | done? doTheFooThing
> was third name in search for something with meaning for intention
>
> | ifreturn doTheFooThing
> this one was seen in my one mail reply, when looking some oneliner
> done by someone else; intention is there, but is it enough?
>
> | returnif doTheFooThing
> was afterthougth for ifreturn; it has familiarity with return and
> also states iffy part
>
> | some-other-name-not-known doTheFooThing
> what is your name for that if-then-return or assign-return-if
> thing?; feel free to express yourself!
>
> | enough? doTheFooThing
> ??? where did that come from ???
>
> -Jippo
>
> --
>  __________________________________________________________________
> [   pub 1024/951AFAF5 1995/12/12   Juha Pohjalainen <jmp@iki.fi>   ]
> [   fingerprint 41 56 7F F9 8E EC 16 35  BB 42 EF A7 DF 19 FA 31   ]
> [__ http://www.iki.fi/jmp/ ________________ GSM +358 40 570 1179 __]
>


In This Thread

Prev Next