[#14464] who uses Python or Ruby, and for what? — ellard2@...01.fas.harvard.edu (-11,3-3562,3-3076)

A while ago I posted a request for people to share their experiences

12 messages 2001/05/01

[#14555] Ruby as a Mac OS/X scripting language — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

10 messages 2001/05/02

[#14557] Arggg Bitten by the block var scope feature!!! — Wayne Scott <wscott@...>

13 messages 2001/05/02

[#14598] Re: Arggg Bitten by the block var scope feature!!! — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

# On Thu, 3 May 2001, Wayne Scott wrote:

9 messages 2001/05/03

[#14636] Yet another "About private methods" question — Eric Jacoboni <jacoboni@...2.fr>

I'm still trying to figure out the semantics of private methods in Ruby.

39 messages 2001/05/04
[#14656] Re: Yet another "About private methods" question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/05/04

Eric Jacoboni <jaco@teaser.fr> writes:

[#14666] Ruby and Web Applications — "Chris Montgomery" <monty@...> 2001/05/04

Greetings from a newbie,

[#14772] Re: Ruby and Web Applications — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/05/07

On Sat, 5 May 2001, Chris Montgomery wrote:

[#14710] Why's Ruby so slow in this case? — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

Sure, Ruby, being interpreted, is slower than a compiled language.

12 messages 2001/05/05

[#14881] Class/Module Information — "John Kaurin" <jkaurin@...>

It is possible to modify the following code to produce

18 messages 2001/05/09

[#15034] Re: calling .inspect on array/hash causes core dump — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "A" == Andreas Riedl <viisi@chello.at> writes:

15 messages 2001/05/12

[#15198] Re: Q: GUI framework with direct drawing ca pabilities? — Steve Tuckner <SAT@...>

Would it be a good idea to develop a pure Ruby GUI framework built on top of

13 messages 2001/05/15

[#15234] Pluggable sorting - How would you do it? — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

Hello all,

16 messages 2001/05/16

[#15549] ColdFusion for Ruby — "Michael Dinowitz" <mdinowit@...2000.com>

I don't currently use Ruby. To tell the truth, I have no real reason to. I'd

12 messages 2001/05/22

[#15569] I like ruby-chan ... — Rob Armstrong <rob@...>

Ruby is more human(e) than Python. We already have too many animals :-).

15 messages 2001/05/23

[#15601] How to avoid spelling mistakes of variable names — ndrochak@... (Nick Drochak)

Since Ruby does not require a variable to be declared, do people find

13 messages 2001/05/23

[#15734] java based interpreter and regexes — "Wayne Blair" <wayne.blair@...>

I have been thinking about the java based ruby interpreter project, and I

48 messages 2001/05/25

[#15804] is it possible to dynamically coerce objects types in Ruby? — mirian@... (Mirian Crzig Lennox)

Greetings to all. I am a newcomer to Ruby and I am exploring the

13 messages 2001/05/27
[#15807] Re: is it possible to dynamically coerce objects types in Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/05/27

Hi,

[#15863] Experimental "in" operator for collections — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

There's one thing where I prefer Python over Ruby. Testing whether an

13 messages 2001/05/28

[#15925] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "M" == Mike <mike@lepton.fr> writes:

43 messages 2001/05/29
[#16070] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...> 2001/05/31

----- Original Message -----

[#16081] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/05/31

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:53:17AM +0900, Hal E. Fulton wrote:

[#16088] Re: Block arguments vs method arguments — Dan Moniz <dnm@...> 2001/05/31

At 11:01 PM 5/31/2001 +0900, Sean Russell wrote:

[#15954] new keyword idea: tryreturn, tryturn or done — Juha Pohjalainen <voidjump@...>

Hello everyone!

12 messages 2001/05/29

[ruby-talk:14641] Re: OOP-ier Tk?

From: "J J" <jj5412@...>
Date: 2001-05-04 14:41:24 UTC
List: ruby-talk #14641
I didn't post all the code here for the sake of not bombing the newsgroup.
The complete example is available here:

http://www.johnjohnsonsoftware.com/ruby/oopiertk.zip

Regards,
  JJ

--
Be Kind, Be Careful, Be Yourself
--
Solid, reliable software at reasonable prices
http://www.johnjohnsonsoftware.com


"Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:OF0930C0C4.5F469B51-ON85256A42.002056C9@raleigh.ibm.com...
> John Johnson wrote:
>
> # Using Tk with Ruby (or any other language) has always seemed a
> # little convoluted. Ruby's scoping for blocks makes this even more
> # so, since the blocks passed to command are scoped when the command
> # is set, not when it's running. This leads to:
> # [...]
> # Of course you have no idea what a p is, so you have to search back
> # through the source to find it. I've been toying with classes that
> # allow me to do the following:
> # [...]
> # As you can see, I have defined methods like onClick for Buttons,
> # onCheck and onUncheck for CheckButtons, etc. Not demonstrated here
> # are methods such as onEnter for FlatButton which allow you to do
> # something when the mouse pointer enters the button.
>
> (Which would have been nice to include for the sake of a complete working
> example.)
>
> # I think it's a whole heck of a lot more
> # intuitive. Notice the @checkBtn.onUncheck for instance. The block it
> # executes is defined where it is used.
> #
> # I plan to pursue this further, what do you  folks think?
>
> I certainly want to encourage such explorations since Ruby/Tk is
> likely to remain something of a useful lowest common GUI denominator
> for quite some time, if the experience of Perl and Python are any
> indication. But I think there are others better qualified to comment
> on the merits of your particular proposal.
>
> In connection with your general question, I'd like to ask if you or
> others are familiar with John E. Grayson's book, "Python and Tkinter
> Programming", which proclaims itself to be "a clean, object-oriented
> interface to the Tcl/Tk graphical toolkit" and which Guido claims is
> "packed with well-explained examples that teach good Python habits".
>
> I don't know much Python and I haven't read this book, but I wonder if
> others who do and have think that its approach could provide any
> useful guidance for "OOP-ier" (cool neologism!) Ruby/Tk work.
>
> Conrad Schneiker
> (This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)
>


In This Thread