[#13775] Problems with racc rule definitions — Michael Neumann <neumann@...>

15 messages 2001/04/17
[#13795] Re: Problems with racc rule definitions — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2001/04/18

Hi,

[#13940] From Guido, with love... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

52 messages 2001/04/20

[#13953] regexp — James Ponder <james@...>

Hi, I'm new to ruby and am coming from a perl background - therefore I

19 messages 2001/04/21

[#14033] Distributed Ruby and heterogeneous networks — harryo@... (Harry Ohlsen)

I wrote my first small distributed application yesterday and it worked

15 messages 2001/04/22

[#14040] RCR: getClassFromString method — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

It would be nice to have a function that returns a class type given a

20 messages 2001/04/22

[#14130] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Guy N. Hurst wrote:

21 messages 2001/04/24
[#14148] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — Stephen White <spwhite@...> 2001/04/24

On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Conrad Schneiker wrote:

[#14188] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/04/25

Hi,

[#14193] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "W. Kent Starr" <elderburn@...> 2001/04/25

On Tuesday 24 April 2001 23:02, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14138] Re: python on the smalltalk VM — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>

FYI: Thought this might be of interest to the JRuby and Ruby/GUI folks.

27 messages 2001/04/24
[#14153] Re: python on the smalltalk VM — Andrew Kuchling <akuchlin@...> 2001/04/24

Conrad Schneiker <schneik@austin.ibm.com> writes:

[#14154] array#flatten! question — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/04/24

Hello.

[#14159] Can I insert into an array — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/04/24

Ok, this may be a dumb question, but, is it possible to insert into an

[#14162] Re: Can I insert into an array — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/04/24

Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> writes:

[#14289] RCR: Array#insert — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2001/04/27

At Wed, 25 Apr 2001 01:28:36 +0900,

[#14221] An or in an if. — Tim Pettman <tjp@...>

Hi there,

18 messages 2001/04/25

[#14267] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Danny van Bruggen,

16 messages 2001/04/26

[#14452] How to do it the Ruby-way 3 — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

First a question: Why is

21 messages 2001/04/30

[ruby-talk:13525] RE: ARGV

From: "Aristarkh A Zagorodnikov" <xm@...3d.ru>
Date: 2001-04-06 05:17:38 UTC
List: ruby-talk #13525
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nosuzuki@e-mail.ne.jp [mailto:nosuzuki@e-mail.ne.jp]On Behalf Of
> John Kaurin
> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 9:10 AM
> To: ruby-talk ML; ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp
> Subject: [ruby-talk:13524] ARGV
> 
> 
> Some confusion on ARGV.
> 
> If I have a file, say, Test.rb, with the line:
> 
>    p ARGV
> 
> And, say, it exists in a directory with some
> other ruby files, a.rb, b.rb, and c.rb.
> 
> Then I invoke it like:
> 
>    ruby Test.rb -> []
>    ruby Test.rb *.py -> ["*.py"]
>    ruby Test.rb *.rb -> ["Test.rb", "a.rb", "b.rb", "c.rb"]
> 
> The first two cases I expected, but for the third
> I expected ["*.rb"] rather than the expanded
> wildcard output.
> 
> Is this behavior correct? Is it documented somewhere?
> Is there documentation on any other anomalies with
> ARGV?
This is not an anomaly - it is the correct shell behaviour.
It expands wildcards to list of files, if there is a viable 
match for it, or sends wildcard as-is if no files match it.

Aristarkh A Zagorodnikov, Lead Programmer, W3D Group
http://www.w3d.ru /// xm@w3d.ru /// ICQ UIN 36987938

In This Thread