[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11420] Re: binding to callers namespace.

From: "Ben Tilly" <ben_tilly@...>
Date: 2001-02-24 01:26:13 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11420
"Joseph McDonald" <joe@vpop.net> wrote:
>
> > However, you might want to think about alternative designs to get the
> > same effect... this is going to get messy pretty quickly :)
>
>Yes.  very messy.  OK, here's another question.  Is it possible
>to get the "name" of a variable that is passed as an argument.
[...]

Your question strangely reminds me of a classic thing you
see in Perl.  People decide that they want to start naming
other variables, pulling things out of them, etc.  In Perl
this is easy to do, but it is a very dangerous practice.

I don't know how to do it in Ruby, nor do I want to find
out.  Rather I suggest that the sane approach is to start
using the keys/values of a hash as variables instead of
messing around with your own variables.

For a complete explanation of why I think this please see
the following explanation of the problem and the issues
it calls in Perl.  Be sure to follow the links to parts 2
and 3.  (Part 3 in particular is one of my favorite
essays on programming philosophy.)

http://perl.plover.com/varvarname.html

I really don't mean to be jumping down your throat here
(though it might look that way), you just happened to set
off a bunch of danger flags.  If the situation is what it
looked like to me, then please read those links and view
this as a lesson learned.  If it is not, then *still*
read those links for general interest and get back saying
that you really wanted something else...

Cheers,
Ben
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

In This Thread

Prev Next