[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:10548] Re: Linking statically with xmlparse - how?

From: "PaulC" <paulch@...>
Date: 2001-02-08 06:38:16 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10548
Florian,

This may not be the most efficient solution however I believe
that the following should build a fully static ruby executable
with all the the extension modules linked statically -

- Unpack xmlparse into the ext directory
- touch xmlparse/MANIFEST (extml.rb checks for this)
- If your expat libs/headers are not in a standard location edit
  $CFLAGS/$LDFLAGS in xmlparse/extconf.rb
- From the main ruby directory
  ./configure --disable-shared --with-static-linked-ext ; make

There is probably an easier solution however this should work

Paul

"Florian v. Walter" <florian.walter@curry.de> wrote in message
news:3A812E59.471F60F9@curry.de...
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to assemble a completely statically linked version of Ruby
> 1.6.2 together with all extension modules and the XMLParser module
> from http://www.yoshidam.net/Ruby.html#xmlparser.
>
> I have managed to successfully compile a statically linked version of
> Ruby by uncommenting the related statements in ext/Setup as advised in
> the README.
>
> Now I'm stuck with integrating the XMLParser into the compilation
> procedure. In the README of XMLParser there is a mention of the
> possibility of statically compiling it in the Ruby executable but no
> further instructions how to do so.
>
> While I'm trying further any help would be very appreciated.
> Thanks!
>
> Florian.
>
> --
> Florian v. Walter (mailto:fwal@curry.de)
> CURRY. SMILE @ WORK.
> Curry Communication GmbH, Behringstrasse 28a, 22765 Hamburg
> Tel.: +49.40.398344.00, Fax: +49.40.398344.09
> -- Please do not send HTML or RTF emails and large attachments. --


In This Thread