[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11004] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes

From: David Alan Black <dblack@...>
Date: 2001-02-16 20:42:49 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11004
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

> On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, David Alan Black wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> > > Sorry, not really...
> > > a = [2,3,5,7]
> > > a[2]          #=> 5, one element in single mode
> > > a[2..2]	      #=> [5], one element in multiple mode
> > irb(main):001:0> a = [1,2,3,4]
> > [1, 2, 3, 4]
> > irb(main):002:0> a[1].type
> > Fixnum
> > irb(main):003:0> a[1..1].type
> > Array
> > I thought the proposed extension to #at would behave like that too -- ?
> 
> What do you mean, would behave like that? The proposed extension would
> make #at(*indices) return an array, but #at cannot distinguish a list of
> one element from a single value -- it's still a parameter list. There is
> no equivalent in the #[] realm, which can distinguish a one-element range
> from a single element fetch anytime.

I think part of the original discussion was whether to extend #at so
that it *did* behave differently when given more than one parameter:

  [1,2,3].at(0)       => 1
  [1,2,3].at(1,2)     => [2,3]

Mike Wilson had questioned whether the first of those two should
return a single value or an array:

  [1,2,3].at(0)       => [1]

Matz had said:

> For consistency, at(0) might be better to return an array, but it's
> incompatibility, which I don't want to incorporate.

I took this to mean consistency across all uses of (the extended) #at
-- namely, that the most consistent thing would be for it always to
return an array.

My subsequent point was that it might not actually be so inconsistent,
broadly taken, since there's a precedent for the idea of an array
fetch that returns a single value for a single-value fetch and an
array for a range-fetch: the current behavior of #[].

(I'm retracing this in hopes of, as usual, having the little lightbulb
go off... it isn't happening yet...  Of course, the little lightbulb
loves watching me hit the <send> button.... :-)


David

-- 
David Alan Black
home: dblack@candle.superlink.net
work: blackdav@shu.edu
Web:  http://pirate.shu.edu/~blackdav


In This Thread

Prev Next