[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11692] Re: How to implement each method

From: "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>
Date: 2001-02-27 14:52:05 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11692


>From: "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
>To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org (ruby-talk ML)
>Subject: [ruby-talk:11691] Re: How to implement each method
>Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 23:48:16 +0900
>
>
>
>
>>From: Max Ischenko <max@malva.com.ua>
>>Reply-To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
>>To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org (ruby-talk ML), ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp
>>Subject: [ruby-talk:11690] Re: How to implement each method
>>Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 23:40:03 +0900
>>
>>At Tue, 27 Feb 2001 21:46:44 +0900 ts wrote:
>>
>> >>>>>> "M" == Max Ischenko <max@malva.com.ua> writes:
>>
>> >      def each
>> >           @packages.each {|x| yield x}
>> >       end
>>
>>
>>Thanks, it works.
>>Also I changed it to
>>     def each
>>         @packages.each {|key,val|
>>             yield val
>>         }
>>     end
>>
>
>def each
>  @packages.each_value {|val| yield val}
>end
>
>no sense iterating over a key that you don't seem to care about ;)
>

I'm left wondering what you're exactly trying to accomplish.  Maybe you just 
didn't know that you could iterate over the values and so now you don't need 
to define an "each" method to do it?  Maybe just,
@packages.each_value {|val| doSomethingWithVal}
will work for you?

Mike Wilson
Unix Administrator
http://ruby.weblogs.com

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

In This Thread

Prev Next