[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11336] Re: numerical limits

From: "Ben Tilly" <ben_tilly@...>
Date: 2001-02-22 18:25:54 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11336
raja@cs.indiana.edu (Raja S.) wrote:
>
>Is there a way in Ruby to determine the largest/smallest representable
>Fixnum and Float?  Since Ruby levarages off the underlying C system this
>will be architecture dependent.  I'm looking for something like 
>Fixnum::MAX,
>Fixnum::MIN and similarly for Floats.

You could add a method to do it for Fixnum based on
the existing size method.  See:

http://www.rubycentral.com/book/ref_c_fixnum.html

Floats don't seem to have any way to do it:

http://www.rubycentral.com/book/ref_c_float.html

Which is mildly ironic since the automatic conversion
to Bignum makes the limit irrelevant for Fixnum, but
what the limit is matters for Float.

>If it isn't currently builtin, it seems that as the language evolves, this
>may be one of the dotting the 'i's and crossing the 't's issue.

I am not seeing it at the moment, but is there any
equivalent to Perl's Configure module?  In Perl this
gives in one place all of the information that Perl
discovered while being configured before being built.
This is then available and is used (see
ExtUtils::MakeMaker) for writing makefiles for all
following modules.  The result allows policy decisions
made while installing Perl to be transparently used by
all CPAN modules.

If Ruby doesn't have this, it would be very nice.  I
have seen RAA applications that just assume that they
know where they should install on my system, making it
hard to test them out with a private user installation
first.  That is the kind of thing that Configure is
meant to detect and avoid.

A sample reason to use this would be to test how a bunch
of applications will work with a new development version
of Ruby *without* having to replace your installed main
version...

Cheers,
Ben
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

In This Thread

Prev Next