[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:10813] Re: PEP ? Ruby

From: David Alan Black <dblack@...>
Date: 2001-02-14 00:37:05 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10813
Hi --

On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Mike Wilson wrote:
> 
> >From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@us.ibm.com>
> >
> >Mike Wilson wrote:
> >
> ># >From: matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
> ># >I'm doing this job for years.  I don't feel the formal proposal
> ># >process like PEP is needed.  The only problem I've met is that I often
> ># >forget topics/requests/proposals.  So that even unformal list of
> ># >proposals (on Wiki) would help me a lot, I think.
> >#
> ># Ok, I've created http://www.pragprog.com/ruby?RubyChangeRequest.  On
> ># that page there are some basic directions and links to
> ># http://www.pragprog.com/ruby?RubyProperRCR and
> ># http://www.pragprog.com/ruby?RubyStandardLibraryRCR
> >#
> ># If there are no problems with this, and everyone's happy, I'll
> ># request that it be pointed to in the FAQ.
> >
> >As a procedural matter, I think you might want to request that people
> >discuss proposed additions on the net first, and only add the things to
> >this area that Matz finds more or less suitable.
> 
> I figured most people would take it to ruby-talk first.  In the case that 
> they didn't, I had planned on posting it myself on their behalf.
  [...]


I'm a little confused about how the Wiki area and this list/newsgroup
are intended to relate to each other.  There's a "NeedDiscussion"
section on the Wiki.  But if we want to keep discussion here, and use
the Wiki more or less as a dynamic, Matz-approved to-do list, then
won't "NeedDiscussion" be counterproductive, since it will be likely
to draw submission and/or discussion of proposals away from the list?


David

-- 
David Alan Black
home: dblack@candle.superlink.net
work: blackdav@shu.edu
Web:  http://pirate.shu.edu/~blackdav

In This Thread

Prev Next