[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:10724] Re: algorithm module(s)

From: "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>
Date: 2001-02-12 14:08:40 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10724
>From: Jon Aseltine <aseltine@cs.umass.edu>
>Reply-To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
>To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org (ruby-talk ML)
>Subject: [ruby-talk:10703] Re: algorithm module(s)
>Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:38:29 +0900
>
>"J. Radcliffe" wrote:
> >
> > I have been giving some thought to writing modules that define some 
>common
> > algorithms. If there is some consistent methodology, they could be
> > reused effectively in a number of ways. Various trees (b-trees,
> > red-black-trees) and graphs come to my mind right away, but there are
> > probably more. I've talked with matju about using these in his 
>ArrayMixin,
> > which would allow someone to, say, use a btree data structure with an
> > array interface.
> >
> > Any thoughts as to how this could be done most effectively?
>
>Dunno, but I have Ruby implementations of algorithms for
>single-source-shortest-path and maximum-weight-bipartite-matching graph
>problems that I can contribute. I am sure they will need to be modified
>a lot, YMMV.
>
>Jon
>--

Just an aside, I've talked to Jeffrey a bit over the last couple of days on 
#ruby-lang.  Jeffrey seems to have quite a few algorithms to contribute to 
the ruby library, as you seem to do.  We had come up with the idea of 
creating an algorithm package, to include b-trees, quicksort, bubblesort, 
graphing algorithms, etc.  Maybe it would be best to create a topic on the 
wiki where we could organize all of this, save a lot of duplication of 
effort, decide exactly what people would want in an algorithm package, and 
discuss the ultimate solutions.  Any objections?

Mike Wilson
Unix Administrator
http://ruby.weblogs.com

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

In This Thread

Prev Next