[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:10837] RCR's

From: Robert Feldt <feldt@...>
Date: 2001-02-14 13:56:05 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10837
Hi,

Great work on RCR for the wiki, Mike. I think an important thing to
address when writing a RCR is why the change is really needed in
RubyProper or RubyStdLibrary as opposed to being loaded in a module or
extension.

Maybe Mike should assemble a "checklist" page with things to check / think
about before submitting RCR?

For example, I'd sure like an infix currying operator for
"chaining" proc's but I'm not sure this is important or generally useful
enough to include in the language as opposed to requiring a file with
the code:

class Proc
  def *(other)
    raise unless arity == other.arity
    proc {|*a| self.call(other.call(*a))}
  end
end

(and then, as a side-note being able to do:

 f = lambda{|x| 2*x}
 g = lambda{|x| x+1}
 h = f * g
 h.call 1         # => 4

 # BTW, this sure might be useful so you can consider this a RCR ;-)
 # and why not throw in some syntactic sugar for the "lambda{|x| ...}"
 # stuff la Haskells "\x -> 2*x" while we're at it!
)

BTW, Is there a Matz-approved definition of whats Standard lib and whats
Base lib? I've seen people use both and I'm not sure they mean the same
thing... Is RubyProper == Ruby language (syntax etc) + built-in
classes? Is Base lib the built-in classes?

Regards,

Robert

In This Thread

Prev Next