[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:10834] Re: Linking statically with xmlparse - how?

From: "Florian v. Walter" <florian.walter@...>
Date: 2001-02-14 11:40:02 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10834
PaulC wrote:

> This may not be the most efficient solution however I believe
> that the following should build a fully static ruby executable
> with all the the extension modules linked statically -
> 
> - Unpack xmlparse into the ext directory
> - touch xmlparse/MANIFEST (extml.rb checks for this)
> - If your expat libs/headers are not in a standard location edit
>   $CFLAGS/$LDFLAGS in xmlparse/extconf.rb
> - From the main ruby directory
>   ./configure --disable-shared --with-static-linked-ext ; make
> 
> There is probably an easier solution however this should work

This one worked partially. The run of configure with the described
parameters worked but it didn't include the modules in the binary.
Editing the Makefile and adding the parameter "-static" to the final
call of gcc however did it. The resulting binary is about 6 MB large
and about 3 MB after stripping. It includes everything from the Ruby
1.6.2 distribution and the xmlparser module.

Thanks for your help.

Best regards,
Florian.

-- 
Florian v. Walter (mailto:fwal@curry.de)
CURRY. SMILE @ WORK.
Curry Communication GmbH, Behringstrasse 28a, 22765 Hamburg
Tel.: +49.40.398344.00, Fax: +49.40.398344.09
-- Please do not send HTML or RTF emails and large attachments. --

In This Thread

Prev Next