[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11385] Re: C scripting: Inline.pm model-- just a toy

From: "John van V." <john_van_v@...>
Date: 2001-02-23 15:45:16 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11385

I spent about an hour looking over the Inline.pm faq on perl.com last night.

From the users admin point of view, or especially mobile development, I think
it is not, as they would like you to believe, a drop in replacement for XSUB.

Since it has to be linked to the compiler that created perl in the first place
it is completely unusable in a distributed environment.

The only practical use I can see is the accessing of shared libs, but still you
need that specific compiler.

Oddly, this product comes out of activestate which is fairly carefully trying
to prevent users from having just such an environment, especially one that is
copylefted.

Inline perl in ruby would make a lot more sense, since the perl compiler is
presumably already on the box being migrated to ruby.


Economic ramble:
I think this kind of analysis is important in defining the difference between
firms  developing revenue streams inside the development community rather than
those providing end user products, like web pages.  The first model restricts
technology by squeezing developers at the head of their revenue stream, the
latter enables it by bringing back revenue from the profit zone.

People dont want tools they want information and entertainment.

=====
John van Vlaanderen

      #############################################
      #    CXN, Inc. Contact:  john@thinman.com   #               #
      #      Proud Sponsor of Perl/Unix of NY     #
      #        http://puny.vm.com                 #                 
      #############################################

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices! http://auctions.yahoo.com/

In This Thread