[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11550] Re: Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby

From: harryo@... (Harry Ohlsen)
Date: 2001-02-25 19:40:04 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11550
>If someone is going to choose a programming language based on what two
>anonymous people say about it on Amazon.com then I really doubt they're
>going very far in the programming world. Programming isn't for everyone --
>if people aren't willing to put a little time and effort into researching a
>new programming language then they need to take up knitting or something :-)

I agree with you basically, but I'll give you myself as an example.
As you say, Ruby has been aroud for quite a while.  If I had not
stumbled across the pickaxe book by chance, I'd probably have never
played with Ruby.  Obviously, as it becomes popular and more books
appear, chance encounters will increase, I guess.

To boost the number of people using it, and hence the amount of useful
sample code, libraries, development tools etc. you do need to get
people to at least look at the language, so they have the opportunity
to fall in love with it.

If I hear nothing but poor reviews of something, it's unlikely I'll go
out of my way to find, install and play with it.  Let's face it, there
are hundreds of programming languages out there, many of which I've
heard and then done absolutely nothing about, and probably hundreds
more I've never heard of.


In This Thread