[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:10664] Re: Even Tcl/Tk goes ActiveSTATE

From: "Franz GEIGER" <fgeiger@...>
Date: 2001-02-10 09:10:02 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10664
> "Even Tcl/Tk ...."?  Better be a bit more careful about how you talk

Sorry, this was not meant that way.

"Even" I said because Tcl/Tk already *has* an IDE: TclPro. Nothing bad about
Tcl/Tk! It's the language that opened the door to the world of scripting to
me.

Franz GEIGER


"Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:OFC8DD0EE1.6F8FC05A-ON852569EE.0061F213@raleigh.ibm.com...
> Franz GEIGER wrote:
>
> # Subject: Even Tcl/Tk goes ActiveSTATE
>
> "Even Tcl/Tk ...."?  Better be a bit more careful about how you talk
> about the people who are now in a position to invite you into their
> exclusive little club. :-) The least you could say is that this is
> potentially great news for keeping Ruby/Tk viable.
>
> # Tcl/Tk goes ActiveSTATE (see below). Shouldn't Ruby go ActiveSTATE
> # too?
>
> Sure (albeit cautiously so). But what would that involve in practice?
> Likely that they would need to hire at least one very strong
> low-level Ruby developer, and maybe take on Matz and the pragmatic
> duo as part-time consultants. And this probably means that you need to
> present ActiveState with a pretty strong business case to justify
> this.
>
> # Perl and Python are already there. Wouldn't it be a real push for
> # Ruby's popularity?
>
> Of course. But also recall, it was Perl and Python's *pre-existing*
> popularity that made them attractive to ActiveState in the first
> place.
>
> # And think of Komodo! An IDE for Ruby, with a visual debugger!
>
> Yup. I've previously mentioned this, but it bears repeating.
>
> # Any plans about this?
>
> Not that I know of. Want to make some?
>
> Conrad Schneiker
> (This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)


In This Thread