[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11218] Re: better "gets"?

From: Nikita Proskourine <nop1@...>
Date: 2001-02-21 06:18:30 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11218
Thanks Dave. The problem was entirely with my stty. Both gets and readline 
now work as expected. I got them working with "stty erase ^H"... The erase 
character was ^? and I never noticed that. Apparently bash doesn't use stty's 
erase setting for deleting characters... deleting things in command line 
works fine with either ^?or ^H as erase chars.

I have to shoot myself for being so stupid. My problem is never checking the 
obvious before searching for sources of trouble in more subtle areas.

Nikita.

On Wednesday 21 February 2001 00:59, you wrote:
> Nikita Proskourine <nop1@cornell.edu> writes:
> > I get the following:
> >
> > adamant:~$ irb
> > irb(main):001:0> readline
> > This is a test^H^H^H^Hsimple test.
> > "This is a test\010\010\010\010simple test.\n"
> > irb(main):002:0> exit
> >
> > adamant:~$
>
> What does 'stty' show as your erase character?
>
>
> Dave

-- 
Nikita Proskourine / Cornell University
"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love."
-- Albert Einstein

In This Thread