[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11374] Re: HP-UX executable?

From: Mark Slagell <ms@...>
Date: 2001-02-23 12:23:57 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11374
"SHULTZ,BARRY (HP-Israel,ex1)" wrote:
> ...
> > Does anybody have an HP-UX (11.0) executable of the ruby
> > interpreter? It
> 
> You can compile it; here's a blade reference:
> 
> http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/~poffice/mail/ruby-talk/9379
> 
> Barry

That advice can apply only after gcc is installed -- anyway I finally
slogged through that and seem to have a functioning ruby interpreter.
I'd given up on building gcc from source after a lot of frustration.
Here's what worked:

1. get and compile GNU sed, put it in /usr/local/bin, put
/usr/local/bin: at front of PATH.

2. get binaries of GNU binutils and gcc from hpux.cs.utah.edu, install
them in /opt, put /opt/binutils/bin:/opt/gcc/bin: at front of PATH.

3. put symlinks in /opt/binutils/bin:
     libbfd-2.9.1.sl.0     -> libbfd-2.9.1.sl.0.0
     libopcodes-2.9.1.sl.0 -> libopcodes-2.9.1.sl.0.0

4. ./configure ruby 1.6.2.

5. try 'make', but it dies with:
         gcc -g -O2 -Wl,-E main.o dmyext.o libruby.a -ldld -lcrypt -lm  
-o miniruby
*** Termination signal 139

6. edit Makefile, set CFLAGS=-O, same result; try again with no
optimizations, successful build.

  -- Mark

In This Thread

Prev Next