[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11304] dRuby problem with Threads

From: ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)
Date: 2001-02-22 10:56:45 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11304
This is a strange one - then again It's about 11:20PM so everything is
looking strange.

I'm finding that method calls on a dRuby object (running on a Windows
machine - calling from a Linux machine in this case) will work just fine
unless they're inside a new thread.

Here's the server code (running on the WindowsNT box):

######server code #############
require 'drb'

class TestServer
   def warpver
      "warp 8.8.8"
   end
   def osver
      `uname -r`
   end
   def pwd
      Dir.pwd
   end
   def runit(command)
      eval(command)
   end

   def eval_it(command)
      puts "in TestServer::eval_it(#{command})"
   end
end

puts "starting server"
aServerObj = TestServer.new
DRb.start_service('druby://localhost:9000', aServerObj)
DRb.thread.join           
####end of server code #####################

Here's the client code (running on a Linux box):

#########client#################
require 'drb'
machine = "calvinnt"
command = "this is the command"
DRb.start_service()
drbObj  = DRbObject.new(nil, "druby://#{machine}:9000")
#thread = Thread.start do
   drbObj.eval_it(command)
#end #thread   
###########end of client code ############

All pretty simple (I've cut out all the extra stuff ).  It works fine 
unless I uncomment the Thread code in the client, like:

require 'drb'
machine = "calvinnt"
command = "this is the command"
DRb.start_service()
drbObj  = DRbObject.new(nil, "druby://#{machine}:9000")
thread = Thread.start do
   drbObj.eval_it(command)
end #thread   

If I run the threaded client, and this is what seems really strange, druby 
reports a bunch of exceptions on the SERVER side - something about bad 
headers.  Why would the server side even 'care' that the call came from a 
different thread on the client?

The other data point here is that it seems to work OK if both client and 
server are running on Linux boxes.  Note: I've installed Ruby 1.6.2 on 
both my Linux boxen and my Windows boxen in the last two days - they seem 
to all have the same drb version (if they didn't it would complain even if 
I left the threading stuff out - drb versions have to match and I believe 
they are all at 1.3 now.

Strange question (and please remember it's late): is it possible that if 
you run the method call in a seperate thread on the client side that drb 
trys to start another thread on the server side (no, that's too bizarre, 
please tell me that's too bizarre)

Phil

In This Thread

Prev Next