[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11650] Re: Putting methods in arrays

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2001-02-27 04:25:47 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11650
Alex McHale <lists@theorigin.org> writes:

>   I'm looking to put a method in an array, to be called at a later time.  
> In C, this is possible using pointers (through some rigamarole and 
> typedefs, it would  look like { funct }).  Is there any way this can 
> similarly be acheived in Ruby?
>   What the end goal is to be able to call the method using 'arr[index] 
> args'.  The purpose of this is that I'm working on a server that might 
> receive one of hundreds of commands from the client side, and this:

...

>   Is this possible?  Is there a better solution for command recognition 
> without endless if/elsif/..?

You've got lots of options.

1. You can construct a set of classes, each with a method called (say) 
   'run', and then assign an object of each class to elements of a
   hash.

     cmdtab = {
       'start' => StartCmd.new,
       'end'   => EndCmd.new
     }

     cmdtab[cmd].run(args...)

2. You can have a set of anonymous procedures which do the work for
   each command, and then put them in a hash:

    cmdtab = {
       'start' => proc { doStart() },
       'end'   => proc { exit(0)   }
     }

    cmdtab[cmd].call(args...)

3. You can write a method with the same name, and put all the methods
   in to a class, then use Object#send to invoke the correct method by 
   name:

    class Command

      def start(arg1, arg2)
        ..
      end

      def end(arg1, ..)
        ..
      end
    end

    cmdHandler = Command.new

    cmdHandler.send(cmd, arg...)

4. You could write each command in a global function and use 'eval' to 
   invoke it (potentially very risky)


You might also want to look at 'method_missing' as a way of handling
method calls.


Regards


Dave

In This Thread