[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:10484] Re: Stealing some Perl infrastructure

From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>
Date: 2001-02-07 06:31:57 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10484
Phil Tomson wrote:

# I was looking at some Win32 perl modules on CPAN recently -
# specifically, I need some functionality that is provided by perl's
# Win32::GuiTest module.  From what I can tell, most of the code
# involved is actually C code - they have C wrappers of some Win32
# system calls, etc. and then they build on them - mostly all in C,
# only one of the funtions was actually written in Perl.  But there's
# a catch, the code they provide is actually not the original C code ,
# but the .xs files which are presumably read by XS (kind of like
# SWIG, but specifically for extending Perl). 
# 
# Now, I could be wrong, but the XS code (somecode.xs) looks mostly
# like C code with some added tags.  Might it not be possible (and
# somebody who is more familiar with XS than I could shed some light
# here) to take the .xs files and munge them somehow to create Ruby
# extentions - or at least to make them readable from SWIG and then
# create Ruby modules from that direction.  It seems like doing this
# could get us a good number of Perl modules (at least where the
# modules rely heavily on C code) fairly quickly. 

Well, I strongly object to calling that stealing, even in jest. As I'm 
sure Larry Wall would be quick to point out, it's *open* *source* 
software!

But anyway, what you suggest seems like a Great Idea (tm), IMHO (albeit an 
uninformed one in this case).

Does anyone know if anyone in Python land has tried something along these 
lines? 

Conrad Schneiker
(This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)

In This Thread

Prev Next