[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11029] Re: Ruby Netiquitte

From: "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>
Date: 2001-02-18 04:22:05 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11029
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Joseph McDonald <joe@vpop.net>
To: ruby-talk ML <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 2:50 PM
Subject: [ruby-talk:11023] RE: Ruby Netiquitte


> 
> I happen to prefer replies *above* the quoted text (and sometimes
> interspersed when warranted).  However, I will try to post below
> the message I am replying to until (and if) the netiquitte for
> this group is changed.
> 
> It is a pain to have to scroll down through a message you have
> already read to get to the meat of the new message, but I'm sure
> people have their reasons for wanting it like that (for now).
> 

Thank you, Joe. I, for one, agree completely.

In the first place, I resent having to scroll to the bottom to add my
comments (especially when most people nowadays put the new
material at the top).

In the second place, I have to scroll AGAIN to skip over the junk 
I have already read.

This is the same logic that causes mail clients to put the newest 
messages at the top. Do others do it the other way? Most recent
at the bottom?

But I will be a good netizen and continue doing it the asinine way.

Hal


In This Thread