[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:10373] Re: Nested modules and classes?

From: Aleksi Niemel<zak@...>
Date: 2001-02-05 14:29:31 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10373
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Guy N. Hurst wrote:

> "Hal E. Fulton" wrote:
> > ...
> > Also, I don't really remember seeing any discussion
> > here of nested classes... though apparently they
> > exist. Are they ever Really Useful or just a mild
> > curiosity?
> > 
> 
> I have not yet seen an answer to this question, and
> I am also interested in understanding this.
> 
> I find nested modules and nested classes,
> as well as nested classes inside nested modules.
> 
> Nowhere have I seen this documented, yet I see it
> used.  What is the scoop?

Nested modules are definitely useful as nested namespaces.

Nested classes are not that useful in my experience. In Java you would
use them for a substitute for blocks (procs) or (not so) anonymous
routines. In Ruby they could be used in a same way, but as we have
blocks already there's hardly any need for them used in that way.

There's good use for nested classes. If you need a class carrying some
data and methods, but feel that it's not important enough for the
others to use or know about it, it might be beneficial to "localize"
the definition, thus place it inside and near the code which uses it.

    - Aleksi


  module MyPackage

    module InnerPackage

      class TheWorker

        def initialize(foo)
          @foo = WorkersHelper.new(foo)
        end

        def foo
          @foo.calculate
        end

        class WorkersHelper
          def initialize(value)
            @value = value
          end
          def calculate
            @value ** 2
          end
        end
      end
    end
  end

  puts MyPackage::InnerPackage::TheWorker.new(10).foo


In This Thread

Prev Next