[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:10305] Re: Possible bug in RubyUnit? Or just my bug?

From: "Noel Rappin" <noel.rappin@...>
Date: 2001-02-03 14:05:23 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10305
Thanks for replying... with a little further investigation, I think I've got
this figured out.

In fact, the system is not hanging -- it was just taking so long to do the
inspect that it seemed like it was hanging.  What would eventually happen is
that inspect would return an out of memory error.  What I think is going on
is that, although there aren't very many objects in my system, they are
intertwined together.  I think that tracing through the object relationships
caused inspect to blow the stack (the eventual error message says "failed to
allocate memory(realloc)" and then says that there are 73 levels in the
stack trace).

So I'm guessing the thing to do is overwrite inspect on one or more of the
classes in question.  Does that sound about right?

Noel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Masaki Suketa [mailto:CQN02273@nifty.ne.jp]
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 7:09 PM
> To: ruby-talk ML
> Subject: [ruby-talk:10293] Re: Possible bug in RubyUnit? Or just my bug?
>
>
> Hello Noel,
>
> In message "[ruby-talk:10101] Possible bug in RubyUnit? Or just my bug?"
>     on 01/01/30, "Noel Rappin" <noel.rappin@openwave.com> writes:
> > But my question is whether there is some bug in my class that
> would cause
> > the hang from to_str?  (At the time the class had no to_s
> method of its own
> > defined).  Does this change seem valid?
>
> The to_str(obj) method calls obj.inspect (Object#inspect) if obj is
> not String object.
> What occurred if you run this script?
>
>   obj = Your_Class.new
>   puts obj.inspect
>
>   Regards,
>   Masaki Suketa
>



In This Thread

Prev Next