[#24183] "yield called out of block" — Mark Slagell <ms@...>

Having just talked with a nuby in email, I believe this error message

27 messages 2001/11/02
[#24243] Re: "yield called out of block" — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/11/03

Hi,

[#24223] Too much eval evil? (tell me why I shouldn't do this) — gandy@... (Thomas Gandy)

I've been doodling with Ruby (experimenting with it in order to figure

13 messages 2001/11/02

[#24335] Joys of eval — Albert Wagner <alwagner@...>

A few weeks ago I posted a request for help with regexp, split, scan, et.

30 messages 2001/11/04
[#24337] Re: Joys of eval — Sean Middleditch <elanthis@...> 2001/11/04

On Sun, 2001-11-04 at 13:29, Albert Wagner wrote:

[#24338] Re: Joys of eval — Albert Wagner <alwagner@...> 2001/11/04

On Sunday 04 November 2001 12:43 pm, you wrote:

[#24339] Re: Joys of eval — Sean Middleditch <elanthis@...> 2001/11/04

On Sun, 2001-11-04 at 14:01, Albert Wagner wrote:

[#24340] Re: Joys of eval — Todd Gillespie <toddg@...> 2001/11/04

On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Sean Middleditch wrote:

[#24351] Re: Joys of eval — Sean Middleditch <elanthis@...> 2001/11/04

On Sun, 2001-11-04 at 14:31, Todd Gillespie wrote:

[#24466] Why is ruby slow (compared to perl) — "Aqil Azmi" <aazmi@...>

Hello,

29 messages 2001/11/06
[#24688] Re: Why is ruby slow (compared to perl) — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/11/08

Niko Schwarz wrote:

[#24694] Re: Why is ruby slow (compared to perl) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/11/08

On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Sean Russell wrote:

[#24511] kill rdtool? — Stefan Nobis <stefan@...>

Hi.

51 messages 2001/11/07
[#24530] RE: kill rdtool? — "Mark Hahn" <mchahn@...> 2001/11/07

[#24534] Re: kill rdtool? — Pierre-Charles David <Pierre-Charles.David@...> 2001/11/07

Mark Hahn wrote:

[#24535] Re: kill rdtool? — "Mark Hahn" <mchahn@...> 2001/11/07

[#24536] Re: kill rdtool? — Eric Lee Green <eric@...> 2001/11/07

On Wednesday 07 November 2001 09:34 am, Mark Hahn wrote:

[#24538] Re: kill rdtool? — "Mark Hahn" <mchahn@...> 2001/11/07

[#24540] Re: kill rdtool? — Eric Lee Green <eric@...> 2001/11/07

On Wednesday 07 November 2001 10:04 am, Mark Hahn wrote:

[#24541] Re: kill rdtool? — "Mark Hahn" <mchahn@...> 2001/11/07

[#24542] Re: kill rdtool? — Eric Lee Green <eric@...> 2001/11/07

On Wednesday 07 November 2001 10:14 am, Mark Hahn wrote:

[#24666] I've ported the python nntplib class to Ruby. I will be adding comments to it soon. Here it is for public commentary and criticism — jheard <jheard@...>

require 'socket'

9 messages 2001/11/08

[#24698] ruby and webservices — Markus Jais <info@...>

hello

46 messages 2001/11/08
[#24715] Re: ruby and webservices — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson) 2001/11/09

In article <9setsu$1378d4$1@ID-75083.news.dfncis.de>,

[#24730] Re: ruby and webservices — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...> 2001/11/09

Actually...its me.

[#24801] Re: XML libraries (Re: Re: ruby and webservices) — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...> 2001/11/09

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#24861] Re: XML libraries (Re: Re: ruby and webservices) — TAKAHASHI Masayoshi <maki@...> 2001/11/11

Hi,

[#24877] Re: XML libraries (Re: Re: ruby and webservices) — Bob Hutchison <hutch@...> 2001/11/11

On 01/11/11 2:20 AM, "TAKAHASHI Masayoshi" <maki@open-news.com> wrote:

[#24700] Strange behaviour of Array#[] — Michael Neumann <neumann@...>

Hi,

12 messages 2001/11/08

[#24750] BUG: net/telnet.rb gives select invalid argument excepition — Ville Mattila <mulperi@...>

20 messages 2001/11/09

[#24810] Ruby-Tk; feature/bug/misunderstanding? mouse-location during when a key is pressed in the presence of TkMenubutton — Armin Roehrl <armin@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2001/11/09

[#24820] ANN: Triple-R - The Rubicon Results Repository — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

16 messages 2001/11/10

[#24926] XML support in the standard lib — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>

Hi,

128 messages 2001/11/12
[#24928] Re: XML support in the standard lib — Bob Hutchison <hutch@...> 2001/11/12

[#25011] Re: XML support in the standard lib; what exactly? — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...> 2001/11/13

PaulC wrote:

[#25014] Re: XML support in the standard lib; what exactly? — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...> 2001/11/13

P.S.

[#25023] Re: XML support in the standard lib; what exactly? — Bob Hutchison <hutch@...> 2001/11/13

On 01/11/13 9:56 AM, "Tobias Reif" <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com> wrote:

[#25027] Re: XML support in the standard lib; what exactly? — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...> 2001/11/13

Bob Hutchison wrote:

[#25037] Re: XML support in the standard lib; what exactly? — Bob Hutchison <hutch@...> 2001/11/13

On 01/11/13 11:21 AM, "Tobias Reif" <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com> wrote:

[#25018] Re: XML support in the standard lib; what exactly? — "Nat Pryce" <nat.pryce@...13media.com> 2001/11/13

The DOM is a pretty awkward API to both use and implement. An API based on

[#25126] Re: XML support in the standard lib; what exactly? — "James Britt (rubydev)" <james@...> 2001/11/14

>

[#25138] Re: XML support in the standard lib; what exactly? — "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@...> 2001/11/14

On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 20:53, James Britt (rubydev) wrote:

[#25151] Re: XML support in the standard lib; whatexactly? — "James Britt (rubydev)" <james@...> 2001/11/14

[#25202] Re: XML support in the standard lib;whatexactly? — "Nat Pryce" <nat.pryce@...13media.com> 2001/11/14

From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>

[#25231] Re: XML support in the standard lib;whatexactly? — "James Britt (rubydev)" <james@...> 2001/11/15

[#25250] Re: XML support in the standard lib;whatexactly? — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...> 2001/11/15

James Britt (rubydev) wrote:

[#25251] Re: XML support in the standard lib;whatexactly? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/11/15

On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Tobias Reif wrote:

[#25020] Re: XML support in the standard lib; what exactly? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/11/13

On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Nat Pryce wrote:

[#25059] Re: XML support in the standard lib; what exactly? — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/11/13

Robert Feldt wrote:

[#25078] Re: XML support in the standard lib; what exactly? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/11/13

On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Sean Russell wrote:

[#25080] Re: XML support in the standard lib; what exactly? — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...> 2001/11/13

Hi all XMLers,

[#25102] Re: XML support in the standard lib; what exactly? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/11/13

Hello --

[#25157] Re: XML support in the standard lib; what exactly? — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...> 2001/11/14

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#25170] Re: XML support in the standard lib; what exactly? — chad fowler <chadfowler@...> 2001/11/14

[#24948] Refactoring tool for Ruby... — Stephan K舂per <Stephan.Kaemper@...>

Just being curious if someone has worked on a refactoring tool for

12 messages 2001/11/12

[#24955] Teach your kid math w/ruby — pete@... (Peter J. Kernan)

14 messages 2001/11/12

[#24958] Linux Magazine article — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

53 messages 2001/11/12
[#26103] Re: Linux Magazine article — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2001/11/22

[#26116] Re: Linux Magazine article — Jos Backus <josb@...> 2001/11/22

On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 10:20:04AM +0900, Bill Kelly wrote:

[#25029] Set class in Ruby — Yuri Leikind <YuriLeikind@...>

Hello all Ruby coders,

18 messages 2001/11/13

[#25082] exiting blox — Niko Schwarz <niko.schwarz@...>

Hi there,

17 messages 2001/11/13

[#25101] ANN: REXML 1.1a3 — Sean Russell <ser@...>

Hiho,

23 messages 2001/11/13

[#25276] GC question — Tony Smith <tony@...>

Hi there!

20 messages 2001/11/15
[#25777] Ruby in windows — "Mark Hahn" <mchahn@...> 2001/11/18

[#25788] RE: Ruby in windows — "Mark Hahn" <mchahn@...> 2001/11/18

This is what I get from command line:

[#25291] Re: ANN: REXML 1.1a3 — Ben Schumacher <BSchumacher@...>

Tobias Reif wrote:

24 messages 2001/11/15

[#25383] Arrays, iterators, and map/collect — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

Hello all...

12 messages 2001/11/16

[#25432] Why not xmlparser? (was: Re: XML support in the standard lib;whatexactly?) — "Christian Boos" <cboos@...>

32 messages 2001/11/16
[#25678] RE: Why not xmlparser? (was: Re: XML support in the standard lib;whatexactly?) — "James Britt (rubydev)" <james@...> 2001/11/16

> I may have missed something, but the original question that started the

[#25722] RE: Why not xmlparser? (was: Re: XML support in the standard lib;whatexactly?) — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/11/17

James Britt (rubydev) wrote:

[#25732] Re: Why not xmlparser? (was: Re: XML support in the standard lib;whatexactly?) — "James Britt (rubydev)" <james@...> 2001/11/17

>

[#25850] Re: Why not xmlparser? (was: Re: XML support in the standard lib;whatexactly?) — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/11/19

James Britt (rubydev) wrote:

[#25689] Would like feedback on script to remove unused import statements in java — "Thomas R. Corbin" <tc@...>

I use this script all the time when developing in java, it really helps a

20 messages 2001/11/17
[#25829] Re: Would like feedback on script to remove unused import statements in java — "Ralph Mason" <ralph.mason@...> 2001/11/19

Is there any documentation on this anywhere?

[#25830] Re: Would like feedback on script to remove unused import statements in java — ts <decoux@...> 2001/11/19

>>>>> "R" == Ralph Mason <ralph.mason@telogis.com> writes:

[#25916] Why the appended '\n' in IO.readlines — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/11/20

Hi

[#25753] Misunderstanding or bug? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

18 messages 2001/11/18

[#25808] KDE or GNOME curiosity question... — Robert Hicks <bobhicks@...>

I was just curious which desktop (of the two mentioned in the subject)

80 messages 2001/11/19
[#26360] Re: [OT] Re: KDE or GNOME curiosity question... — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2001/11/24

[#26374] Re: [OT] Re: KDE or GNOME curiosity question... — "Mark Hahn" <mchahn@...> 2001/11/24

[#26518] Re: [OT] Re: KDE or GNOME curiosity question... — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2001/11/26

> How hard would it be to have an option to use reference counting in a

[#26544] Re: [OT] Re: KDE or GNOME curiosity question... — "mark hahn" <mchahn@...> 2001/11/26

> Circular references will cause the object to stay around indefinitely

[#26746] Re: [OT] Re: KDE or GNOME curiosity question... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/11/28

Hi,

[#26825] RE: Ref Counting (was KDE or GNOME curiosity question...) — "Mark Hahn" <mchahn@...> 2001/11/28

[#26827] Re: Ref Counting (was KDE or GNOME curiosity question...) — "Matt Armstrong" <matt+dated+1007407366.0f6d51@...> 2001/11/28

"Mark Hahn" <mchahn@facelink.com> writes:

[#25861] A bug invoking a method with send? — chr_news@... (chr_news@...)

Hi,

12 messages 2001/11/19

[#25907] String#== : Why not error with different type? — furufuru@... (Ryo Furue)

Hi there,

17 messages 2001/11/20

[#25954] a quick question — Tobias DiPasquale <anany@...>

Hi all,

21 messages 2001/11/20
[#25959] PocketPC — "Chad Fowler" <chadfowler@...> 2001/11/20

Has anyone gotten Ruby running (perhaps in some limited form) on the

[#26006] R: Re: Hello World considered harmful — Alessandro Caruso <a.caruso@...>

I thought the main reason people are moving towards Ruby instead of keep

19 messages 2001/11/21
[#26023] Re: R: Re: Hello World considered harmful — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/11/21

Alessandro Caruso <a.caruso@creditonline.it> writes:

[#26029] Re: R: Re: Hello World considered harmful — Erik B虍fors <erik@...> 2001/11/21

On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 15:31, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#26126] Conformance Test of XML Parsers in Ruby(20011122) — TAKAHASHI Masayoshi <maki@...>

Hi all,

27 messages 2001/11/22
[#26128] Re: Conformance Test of XML Parsers in Ruby(20011122) — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...> 2001/11/22

TAKAHASHI Masayoshi wrote:

[#26134] Re: Conformance Test of XML Parsers in Ruby(20011122) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/11/22

Hello --

[#26145] Re: Conformance Test of XML Parsers in Ruby(20011122) — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...> 2001/11/22

--- David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net

[#26181] Re: NQXML Conformance (was Re: Conformance Test of XML Parsers in Ruby(20011122)) — martin@... (Martin v. Loewis) 2001/11/22

Jim Menard <jimm@io.com> writes:

[#26141] Passing class names to constructors. — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

If I want to create a variable number of objects, all of

14 messages 2001/11/22

[#26205] Book "Rub in 21 days" Table of contents online — Markus Jais <mjais@...>

hi

17 messages 2001/11/23

[#26214] generating and serving SVG — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>

Hi,

39 messages 2001/11/23
[#26215] Re: generating and serving SVG — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/11/23

On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Tobias Reif wrote:

[#26270] Table: Ruby versus Smalltalk, Objective-C, C++, Java; — Armin Roehrl <armin@...>

Hi,

28 messages 2001/11/24

[#26293] The results are in... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

28 messages 2001/11/24
[#26365] Re: The results are in... — Albert Wagner <alwagner@...> 2001/11/24

<snip>

[#26377] Re: The results are in... — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/11/24

On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, Albert Wagner wrote:

[#26389] Re: The results are in... — Albert Wagner <alwagner@...> 2001/11/25

On Saturday 24 November 2001 05:03 pm, you wrote:

[#26391] Re: The results are in... — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/11/25

On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, Albert Wagner wrote:

[#26337] Re: Table: Ruby versus Smalltalk, Objective-C, C++, Java; — "john%johnknight.com@..." <john%johnknight.com@...>

16 messages 2001/11/24

[#26362] Selector Namespaces: A Standard Feature for Smalltalk? — "David Simmons" <david.simmons@...>

Here is an incentive for classic Smalltalk evolution...

26 messages 2001/11/24

[#26537] Ruby vs. Python: Decisions, Decisions — "Bob Calco" <rcalco@...>

Everyone:

32 messages 2001/11/26

[#26557] Re: Ruby vs. Python: Decisions, Decisions — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

21 messages 2001/11/26

[#26651] Vote in the current poll! — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

26 messages 2001/11/27
[#26685] Re: Vote in the current poll! — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson) 2001/11/27

In article <Pine.GSO.4.21.0111271419390.9896-100000@godzilla.ce.chalmers.se>,

[#26702] Re: Vote in the current poll! — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/11/27

On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Phil Tomson wrote:

[#26752] Anyone know of a Regexp pattern random string generator? — "Ross Shaw" <rshaw1961@...>

I'm looking for some Ruby that given a Regexp pattern will generate a random

10 messages 2001/11/28

[#26782] RE: overload possible? — Wyss Clemens <WYS@...>

No, UNLESS you ask Guy Decoux (ts) to give you his *extension*

31 messages 2001/11/28
[#26791] Re: overload possible? — ts <decoux@...> 2001/11/28

>>>>> "W" == Wyss Clemens <WYS@helbling.ch> writes:

[#26792] Re: overload possible? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/11/28

On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, ts wrote:

[#26847] Re: overload possible? — "Harry Ohlsen" <harryo@...> 2001/11/28

Here's a slightly better version, which also fixes the problem that

[#26860] Re: overload possible? — nobu.nokada@... 2001/11/29

At Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:13:36 +0900,

[#26861] Re: overload possible? — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...> 2001/11/29

excellent idea...how about this refactoring...

[#26894] short article draft for review — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>

Hi,

26 messages 2001/11/29
[#26898] Re: short article draft for review — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/11/29

Hi --

[#26899] Re: short article draft for review — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...> 2001/11/29

David,

[#26902] Re: short article draft for review — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/11/29

Hi --

[#26973] thoughts on virtual base classes, interfaces — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

16 messages 2001/11/29

[#26976] first class functions in Ruby — "MikkelFJ" <mikkelj-anti-spam@...1.dknet.dk>

In the thread on language design, I mentioned a wish for functions as first

15 messages 2001/11/29

[#26984] Can someone explain TupleSpaces? — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

I looked at the examples that came with drb, but I'm still not quite

16 messages 2001/11/29

[#27054] Using Enumerable — Peter Hickman <peter@...>

Im trying to write my own each method for a 'sort of' range class that

19 messages 2001/11/30
[#27057] Re: Using Enumerable — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/11/30

Hello --

[#27060] Re: Using Enumerable — Peter Hickman <peter@...> 2001/11/30

Thanks to all who replied, like all ruby it was alot simpler than I

[#27066] Musing — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

32 messages 2001/11/30
[#27079] RE: Musing — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...> 2001/11/30

Do it Dude!

[ruby-talk:25952] Re: RUBY NEWSGROUP FAQ -- Welcome to comp.lang.ruby! (Revised 2001-11-08)

From: "Robert Linder" <robert_linder_2000@...>
Date: 2001-11-20 22:38:44 UTC
List: ruby-talk #25952
[ruby-talk:25946] Re: ANN: regex engine development (was: Re: Why not
xmlparser?)

is repeating , I got 26 copies in the last 2 mins.



I do not have a big enough mailbox for this junk.

If it does not stop, I have to remove myself from this mailing list

thanks you

----- Original Message -----
From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>; <undisclosed-recipients:>
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 02:24
Subject: [ruby-talk:24640] RUBY NEWSGROUP FAQ -- Welcome to comp.lang.ruby!
(Revised 2001-11-08)


> RUBY NEWSGROUP FAQ -- Welcome to comp.lang.ruby!  (Revised 2001-11-08)
>
> This FAQ contains information for those who want to:
>
>   1) learn more about Ruby, and want to
>   2) post to comp.lang.ruby or to the ruby-lang mail list, or want to
>   3) provide anonymous feedback to help us improve Ruby.
>
> This FAQ is normally posted every 2 weeks or so.
>
> TABLE OF CONTENTS
>
>     1 About Ruby.
>     1.1 What is Ruby?
>     1.2 Where can I find out more about Ruby?
>     2 About comp.lang.ruby.
>     2.1 Tell me about comp.lang.ruby.
>     2.2 Tell me the posting guidelines for comp.lang.ruby.
>     2.3 Tell me about the prolific Matz poster.
>     3. Anything else?
>
> 1 About Ruby.
>
> 1.1 What is Ruby?
>
>     Ruby is a very high level, fully OO programming language. Indeed,
>     Ruby is one of the relatively few pure OO languages. Yet despite
>     its conceptual simplicity, Ruby is still a powerful and practical
>     "industrial strength" development language.
>
>     Ruby selectively integrates many good ideas taken from Perl,
>     Python, Smalltalk, Eiffel, ADA, Clu, and Lisp.  (Ruby is more
>     fully OO than Python in so far as basic types such as hashes can
>     be subclassed. See Ruby FAQ 1.4.) Ruby combines these ideas in a
>     natural, well-coordinated system that embodies the principles of
>     least effort and least surprise to a substantially greater extent
>     than most comparable languages--i.e. you get more bang for your
>     buck, and what you write is more likely to give you what you
>     expected to get.  Ruby is thus a relatively easy to learn, easy to
>     read, and easy to maintain language, yet it is very powerful and
>     sophisticated.
>
>     In addition to common OO features, Ruby also has threads,
>     singleton methods, mix-ins, fully integrated closures and
>     iterators, plus proper meta-classes.   Ruby has a true
>     mark-and-sweep garbage collector, which makes code more reliable
>     and simplifies writing extensions.  In summary, Ruby provides a
>     very powerful and very easy to deploy "standing on the shoulders
>     of giants" OO scaffolding/framework so that you can more quickly
>     and easily build what you want to build, to do what you want to
>     do.
>
>     You will find many former (and current) Perl, Python, Java, and
>     C++ users on comp.lang.ruby that can help you get up to speed in
>     Ruby.
>
>     Finally, Ruby is an "open source" development programming
>     language.
>
> 1.2 Where can I find out more about Ruby?
>
>     Ruby's home web site:
>
>         http://www.ruby-lang.org/en (Ruby English language home page.)
>
>             Follow the links to documentation, downloads, the Ruby
>             Application Archive, the Ruby mail list archives, and lots
>             of other interesting information.
>
>     Ruby's other major on-line documentation and links site:
>
>         http://www.rubycentral.com
>
>     Ruby FAQ:
>
>         http://www.rubycentral.com/faq/
>
>     Ruby User's Guide (introductory tutorial):
>
>         http://www.ruby-lang.org/~slagell/ruby/
>
>     Ruby Reference Manual:
>
>         http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/doc.html
>
>     Ruby classes, modules, and methods reference:
>
>         http://www.rubycentral.com/ref/
>
>     English language Ruby books (author alpha order):
>
>         Ruby In A Nutshell
>         by Yukihiro Matsumoto
>         O'Reilly & Associates; ISBN: 0596002149 (November, 2001)
>
>         Programming Ruby, A Pragmatic Guide
>         by Dave Thomas and Andrew Hunt
>         Addison Wesley; ISBN: 0201710897 (2000)
>         Internet version: http://www.rubycentral.com/ref/
>         Eratta: http://www.pragmaticprogrammer.com/ruby/errata.html
>
>     Forthcoming English language Ruby books (author alpha order):
>
>         The Ruby Way
>         by Hal Fulton
>         Sams; ISBN: 0672320835 (December, 2001)
>
>         The Ruby Programming Language
>         by Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto and Keiju Ishitsuka
>         Addison Wesley Professional; ISBN: 020171096X (June, 2002)
>
>         Ruby Developer's Guide
>         by Michael Neumann, Robert Feldt, Lyle Johnson
>         Publishers Group West; ISBN: 1928994644 (December, 2001)
>
>         Sams Teach Yourself Ruby in 21 Days
>         by Mark Slagell
>         Sams; ISBN: 0672322528 (January, 2002)
>
>     Forthcoming German language Ruby books (author alpha order):
>
>         Programmieren mit Ruby
>         by Armin Rrl, Stefan Schmiedl, Clemens Wyss, etc.
>         dpunkt.de; ISBN 3898641511 (February, 2002)
>
>     Search past postings to comp.lang.ruby or the ruby-lang mail list
>     (which have been mirrored to each other since mid-2000):
>
>         http://www.deja.com/home_ps.shtml
>         (Enter comp.lang.ruby in the "forum" entry field.)
>
>         http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/ruby/ruby-talk/index.shtml
>
>     Local Ruby users and groups in your area:
>
>         http://www.pragprog.com/ruby?RubyUserGroups
>
> 2 About comp.lang.ruby.
>
> 2.1 Tell me about comp.lang.ruby.
>
>     comp.lang.ruby was officially approved in early May, 2000. Here
>     is the official charter:
>
>         CHARTER: comp.lang.ruby
>
>         The comp.lang.ruby newsgroup is devoted to discussions of the
>         Ruby programming language and related issues.
>
>         Examples of relevant postings include, but are not be limited
>         to, the following subjects:
>
>         - Bug reports
>         - Announcements of software written with Ruby
>         - Examples of Ruby code
>         - Suggestions for Ruby developers
>         - Requests for help from new Ruby programmers
>
>         The newsgroup is not moderated.  Binaries are prohibited
>         (except the small PGP type). Advertising is prohibited (except
>         for announcements of new Ruby-related products).
>
>         END CHARTER.
>
> 2.2 Tell me the posting guidelines for comp.lang.ruby.
>
>     (You should also follow these guidelines for the ruby-list mail
>     list, since it is mirrored to comp.lang.ruby.)
>
>     (1) ALWAYS be friendly, considerate, tactful, and tasteful.  We
>         want to keep this forum hospitable to the growing ranks of
>         newbies, very young people, and their teachers, as well as
>         cater to fire breathing wizards.  :-)
>
>     (2) Keep your content relevant and easy to follow. Try to keep
>         your content brief and to the point, but also try to include
>         all relevant information.
>
>         (a) The general format guidelines (aka USENET Netiquette) are
>             matters of common sense and common courtesy that make life
>             easier for 3rd parties to follow along (in real time or
>             when perusing archives):
>
>             - PLEASE NOTE! Include quoted text from previous posts
>               *BEFORE* your responses. And *selectively* quote as much
>               as is relevant.
>             - Use *plain* text; don't use HTML, RTF, or Word. Most
>               mail or newsreader program have an option for this; if
>               yours doesn't, get a (freeware) program or use a
>               web-based service that does.
>             - Include examples from files as *in-line* text; don't
>               use attachments.
>
>         (b) If reporting a problem, give *all* the relevant
>             information the first time; this isn't the psychic friends
>             newsgroup.  :-)  When appropriate, include:
>
>             - The version of Ruby. ("ruby -v")
>             - The compiler name and version used to build Ruby.
>             - The OS type and level. ("uname -a")
>             - The actual error messages.
>             - An example (preferably simple) that produces the
>               problem.
>
>         (c) If reporting a bug, please copy (cc:) your post to:
>
>                 mailto:ruby-bugs@ruby-lang.org
>
>             This will enter your report into the Ruby bug database.
>             You can browse the database at:
>
>                 http://www.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/ruby-bugs
>
>     (3) Make the subject line maximally informative, so that people
>         who should be interested will read your post and so that people
>         who wouldn't be interested can easily avoid it.
>
>         *Usefully* describe the contents of your post:
>
>             This is OK:
>
>                 "How can I do x with y on z?"
>                 "Problem: did x, expected y, got z."
>                 "Bug: doing x with module y crashed z."
>
>             This is *NOT* OK:
>
>                 "Please help!!!"
>                 "Newbie question"
>                 "Need Ruby guru to tell me what's wrong"
>
>     (4) Finally, be considerate: don't be too lazy. If you are
>         seeking information, first make a reasonable effort to look it
>         up. As appropriate, check the Ruby home page, check the Ruby
>         FAQ and other documentation, use deja.com to search past
>         comp.lang.ruby postings, and so on.
>
> 2.3 Tell me about the prolific Matz poster.
>
>     Matz (aka Yukihiro Matsumoto) is the wizard who created Ruby for
>     us, so be nice to him. He is very busy, so be patient when asking
>     questions. See the Ruby home page to find out more about him and
>     his work. I founded comp.lang.ruby at his suggestion. Contrary to
>     lots of skepticism, it was approved on the first attempt, with 200
>     yes votes.
>
> 3. Anything else?
>
>     If you are new to Ruby (or haven't previously taken the Ruby User
>     Survey), please take a moment to anonymously tell us about your
>     programming background and about your Ruby-related interests. The
>     results will be reported back to the Ruby community from time to
>     time. This helps us do a better job of helping each other, and to
>     more effectively expand the Ruby community for our mutual benefit.
>     The survey is at:
>
>         http://dev.rubycentral.com/survey.html
>
>     This FAQ was produced by Conrad Schneiker (schneiker@jump.net).
>     I'm interested in corrections and suggestions, but remember that
>     the purpose of this FAQ is to be a brief and simple introduction
>     for new comp.lang.ruby readers.
>
>     In closing, one of the reasons that Ruby was designed to be
>     relatively simple, uniform, yet very powerful was to make serious
>     programming (among other kinds) fun.  We hope you will help us
>     keep comp.lang.ruby fun as well. Enjoy.  :-)
>
>


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

In This Thread

Prev Next