From: mrchameleon@... (Chris Reay)
Date: 2001-11-17T07:17:01+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:25682] Re: more on [matz:"Human Oriented Programming"?]

> 
> * "But complexity is OK if human can handle it."
> 
> How did you arrive at this conlusion/insight?
> 
> Would you ellaborate a little on it/give small example?
> 
> thanks!
> 
> /H

A liberal translation of Occam's razor may be as follows ...

"Ruby should be as simple as possible, but no simpler".

Oversimplification is counterproductive, as is obfuscation.

Yours

Chris