From: Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...>
Date: 2001-11-04T02:13:29+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:24275] Re: "yield called out of block"

--- David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> wrote:
> > |  "yield called but no block given"
> > |  "there is nothing to yield to"
> > |  "an iterator usually needs to be given something to
> do" ;-)

> > "no block to yield"?

>    no block to yield to
> 
> might be clearer.  Or
> 
>    yield called in the absence of a block

Or perhaps something that suggests the solution more than
the problem:
  "Must have block to yield (to)"
  "Yield requires a passed block"

Kevin


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com