From: Sean Russell <ser@...>
Date: 2001-11-12T02:51:54+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:24885] Re: Why is ruby slow (compared to perl)

Kent Dahl wrote:

>> it isn't used because it is too slow.  On the other hand, fast code will
>> tend to be used even if it is really, really.
> 
> ...real? Ugly? Hackish? Dangerous?

Sorry.  Edit casualty.  "...really, really ugly."

> This because I read the refactoring rules in XP sort-of like the DRY
> principle in Pragmatic Programmers. So if the code gets inserted
> automatically, it doesn't matter as much.
> 
> Now, talk is cheap, so I gave a (naive) stab at doing the inlining at
> method definition time.

This was great!  Thanks!

--- SER


-----=  Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News  =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
 Check out our new Unlimited Server. No Download or Time Limits!
-----==  Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers!  ==-----