From: Jim Menard <jimm@...>
Date: 2001-11-23T05:56:08+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:26177] Re: Conformance Test of XML Parsers in Ruby(20011122)

"James Britt (rubydev)" <james@rubyxml.com> writes:

> What the larger application accepted was XML, and what it emitted was XML, but there isn't a good name for the markup/data while in
> that middle processing stage.  Perhaps it's a problem of terminology; there's no such thing as "almost XML".  But "almost XML"
> processors can be very useful.  What do you call them? What do you call the stuff they handle?

Not Quite XML? (http://www.io.com/~jimm/downloads/nqxml/)

Jim
-- 
Jim Menard, jimm@io.com, http://www.io.com/~jimm/
As a math major, I don't have to be able to add -- I just have to be able
to PROVE that I can add.