From: Tobias Reif Date: 2001-11-16T01:29:35+09:00 Subject: [ruby-talk:25275] Re: ANN: REXML 1.1a3 David Alan Black wrote: > Here's an ampersand and a greater-than sign: & > > > one would expect to end up with this, on output: > > Here's an ampersand and a greater-than sign: & > Hmmm... I have to go read. I thought it's OK for a parser+writer to leave them like they are. (like with NCRs). They're predefined named entities, that point to the corresponding NCRs, so perhaps substitute them with the NCRs? Otherwise < in the input, becomes < in the output, which is not well-formed. I'm sure Sean will find the answers in the spec. Tobi -- Tobias Reif http://www.pinkjuice.com/myDigitalProfile.xhtml go_to('www.ruby-lang.org').get(ruby).play.create.have_fun http://www.pinkjuice.com/ruby/