From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>
Date: 2001-11-15T20:44:05+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:25254] Re: XML support in the standard lib;whatexactly?

Robert Feldt wrote:


>>At first, I believed DOM and SAX are most important, because they are 
>>some kind of standard (one a rec, one a defacto standard in Java), and 
>>that this would equate some kind of PoLS.
>>
> Depends on how much experience you have with XML. If you're just a Ruby
> programmer who want to do some XML then maybe a Rubyesque API is more PoLS
> than SAX and/or DOM. For me at least... ;-)


Yet another good point for RubyWay APIs :)

Tobi



-- 
Tobias Reif
http://www.pinkjuice.com/myDigitalProfile.xhtml

go_to('www.ruby-lang.org').get(ruby).play.create.have_fun
http://www.pinkjuice.com/ruby/