From: David Alan Black <dblack@...>
Date: 2001-11-03T11:56:46+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:24245] Re: "yield called out of block"

Hello --

On Sat, 3 Nov 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In message "[ruby-talk:24183] "yield called out of block""
>     on 01/11/03, Mark Slagell <ms@iastate.edu> writes:
>
> |How about any of the following:
> |
> |  "yield called but no block given"
> |  "there is nothing to yield to"
> |  "an iterator usually needs to be given something to do" ;-)
> |
> |Anyway, the current message doesn't quite seem to capture what is wrong.
> |My correpondent was convinced there was something wrong with the
> |iterator method.
>
> "no block to yield"?

Maybe:

   no block to yield to

might be clearer.  Or

   yield called in the absence of a block


David

-- 
David Alan Black
home: dblack@candle.superlink.net
work: blackdav@shu.edu
Web:  http://pirate.shu.edu/~blackdav