[#33161] Call/CC and Ruby iterators. — olczyk@... (Thaddeus L Olczyk)

Reading about call/cc in Scheme I get the impression that it is very

11 messages 2002/02/05

[#33242] favicon.ico — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

19 messages 2002/02/06
[#33256] Re: favicon.ico — Leon Torres <leon@...> 2002/02/06

[#33435] Reg: tiny contest: who's faster? (add_a_gram) — grady@... (Steven Grady)

> My current solution works correctly with various inputs.

17 messages 2002/02/08

[#33500] Ruby Embedded Documentation — William Djaja Tjokroaminata <billtj@...>

Hi,

24 messages 2002/02/10
[#33502] Re: Ruby Embedded Documentation — "Lyle Johnson" <ljohnson@...> 2002/02/10

> Now, I am using Ruby on Linux, and I have downloaded Ruby version

[#33615] Name resolution in Ruby — stern@... (Alan Stern)

I've been struggling to understand how name resolution is supposed to

16 messages 2002/02/11

[#33617] choice of HTML templating system — Paul Brannan <paul@...>

I am not a web developer, nor do I pretend to be one.

23 messages 2002/02/11

[#33619] make first letter lowercase — sebi@... (sebi)

hello,

20 messages 2002/02/11
[#33620] Re: [newbie] make first letter lowercase — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...> 2002/02/11

sebi wrote:

[#33624] Re: [newbie] make first letter lowercase — "Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan" <jeffp@...> 2002/02/11

On Feb 11, Tobias Reif said:

[#33632] Re: [newbie] make first letter lowercase — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2002/02/12

[#33731] simple XML parsing (greedy / non-greedy — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

Suppose I had this text

14 messages 2002/02/13

[#33743] qualms about respond_to? idiom — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hi --

28 messages 2002/02/13
[#33751] Re: qualms about respond_to? idiom — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/02/13

David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

[#33754] Re: qualms about respond_to? idiom — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2002/02/13

Hi --

[#33848] "Powered by Ruby" banner — Yuri Leikind <YuriLeikind@...>

Hello Ruby folks,

78 messages 2002/02/14
[#33909] Re: "Powered by Ruby" banner — Leon Torres <leon@...> 2002/02/14

On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Yuri Leikind wrote:

[#33916] RE: "Powered by Ruby" banner — "Jack Dempsey" <dempsejn@...> 2002/02/15

A modest submission:

[#33929] Re: "Powered by Ruby" banner — yet another bill smith <bigbill.smith@...> 2002/02/15

Kent Dahl wrote:

[#33932] OT Netscape 4.x? was Re: "Powered by Ruby" banner — Chris Gehlker <gehlker@...> 2002/02/15

On 2/15/02 5:54 AM, "yet another bill smith" <bigbill.smith@verizon.net>

[#33933] RE: OT Netscape 4.x? was Re: "Powered by Ruby" banner — "Jack Dempsey" <dempsejn@...> 2002/02/15

i just don't understand why it didn't show up! dhtml/javascript, ok, but a

[#33937] Re: OT Netscape 4.x? was Re: "Powered by Ruby" banner — Chris Gehlker <gehlker@...> 2002/02/15

On 2/15/02 7:16 AM, "Jack Dempsey" <dempsejn@georgetown.edu> wrote:

[#33989] Re: OT OmniWeb [was: Netscape 4.x?] — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2002/02/16

Chris Gehlker wrote:

[#33991] Re: OT OmniWeb [was: Netscape 4.x?] — Rob Partington <rjp@...> 2002/02/16

In message <3c6e5e01_1@spamkiller.newsgroups.com>,

[#33993] Re: OT OmniWeb [was: Netscape 4.x?] — Thomas Hurst <tom.hurst@...> 2002/02/16

* Rob Partington (rjp@browser.org) wrote:

[#33925] Re: "Powered by Ruby" banner — Martin Maciaszek <mmaciaszek@...> 2002/02/15

In article <3C6CFCCA.5AD5CA67@scnsoft.com>, Yuri Leikind wrote:

[#33956] Re: "Powered by Ruby" banner — Leon Torres <leon@...> 2002/02/15

On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Martin Maciaszek wrote:

[#33851] Ruby and .NET — Patrik Sundberg <ps@...>

I have been reading a bit about .NET for the last couple of days and must say

53 messages 2002/02/14

[#34024] Compiled companion language for Ruby? — Erik Terpstra <erik@...>

Hmmm, seems that my previous post was in a different thread, I'll try

12 messages 2002/02/16

[#34036] The GUI Returns — "Horacio Lopez" <vruz@...>

Hello all,

33 messages 2002/02/17

[#34162] Epic4/Ruby — Thomas Hurst <tom.hurst@...>

Rejoice, for you no longer have to put up with that evil excuse for a

34 messages 2002/02/18

[#34185] Operator overloading and multiple arguments — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

I'm trying to overload the '<=' operator in a class in order to use it for

10 messages 2002/02/18

[#34217] Ruby for web development — beripome@... (Billy)

Hi all,

21 messages 2002/02/19

[#34350] FAQ for comp.lang.ruby — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

RUBY NEWSGROUP FAQ -- Welcome to comp.lang.ruby! (Revised 2001-2-18)

15 messages 2002/02/20

[#34375] Setting the Ruby continued — <jostein.berntsen@...>

Hi,

24 messages 2002/02/20
[#34384] Re: Setting the Ruby continued — Paulo Schreiner <paulo@...> 2002/02/20

Also VERY important:

[#34467] recursive require — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

I'm having a really odd thing happen with two files that mutually

18 messages 2002/02/21

[#34503] special characters — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>

Hi all,

13 messages 2002/02/22

[#34517] Windows Installer Ruby 166-0 available — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

16 messages 2002/02/22

[#34597] rdoc/xml questions — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

24 messages 2002/02/23

[#34631] Object/Memory Management — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...>

I'm new to Ruby and the community here (I've been learning Ruby for a grand

44 messages 2002/02/23

[#34682] duplicate method name — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

I just found a case in a test file where i had two tests of the same

16 messages 2002/02/24
[#34687] Re: duplicate method name — s@... (Stefan Schmiedl) 2002/02/24

Hi Ron.

[#34791] Style Question — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

So I'm building this set theory library. The "only" object is supposed

13 messages 2002/02/25

[#34912] RCR?: parallel to until: as_soon_as — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>

Hi,

18 messages 2002/02/26

[#34972] OT A Question on work styles — Chris Gehlker <gehlker@...>

As a Mac baby I just had to step through ruby in GDB *from the command line*

20 messages 2002/02/28

[#35015] Time Comparison — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...>

I am using the time object to compare times between two files and I'm

21 messages 2002/02/28

Re: OT OmniWeb [was: Netscape 4.x?]

From: Thomas Hurst <tom.hurst@...>
Date: 2002-02-18 15:51:44 UTC
List: ruby-talk #34157
* Sean Russell (ser@germane-software.com) wrote:

> Thomas Hurst wrote:
>
[Dynamically linked /bin]
> Bad news.  I'm glad I've never encountered it.  It sounds like an advisory 
> email to the worst offenders (Redhat?  Mandrake?) is in order.

Probably, but I'd rather keep it as a way to bash them ;)

Plenty of people here use these dist's (that was a RedHat box I
believe), they can do it, or they can switch to something good ;)

[/Vim?/]
> Until you get in the habit of keeping track of which mode you're in,
> it is easy to make mistakes.

That big-ass "-- INSERT --" is enough of a hint for me to keep track of
modes as well as, if not better than keeping track of, say, where my
mouse is.

> If you're like me, you probably hit "ESC" a lot

No, I rebound ESC to caps lock actually :)

> when you don't need to while working in vi, just to make sure you're
> in the right mode.  By now, it is second nature, and I don't notice
> that I do it.

I don't hit escape much, actually, not in vim anyway.

> Again, the caveat is that, by now, I love modes -- however, I try not
> to confuse "what I like" with "what is correct, or best."

Well, vi is aimed at console and keyboard use; there's not a whole lot
of other ways you can squeeze all that power into an editor without
either using emacs-style Ctrl-Meta-Alt-Delete-Backslash-A-B-Esc or Vim
style <ESC>:<commands>.

User interface designers can spout off as much as they like about it,
but until they come up with a more intuitive editor that keeps the power
and speed, they're just spouting.

> > Some syntax folding support would be nice though.. things like huge
> > quantities of inline documentation are really destracting.
>
> I think they have it -- isn't it in the most current version of the
> Ruby mode??  I seem to remember it being mentioned in a thread in this
> group, somewhere.

Yeah, but I'm lazy, and I don't usually write code I want to fold, so
the cost of looking into it and installing it were greater than ignoring
it and waiting for vim patchlevel 3,000 or Vim 6.1 ;)

> Try the Project.vim script.

I'll have a look.  Think I grabbed it and forgot about it.

> > Not really.  There's nothing stopping someone who doesn't believe in
> > God thinking the question is currently or ultimately unsolvable.
>
> Hmmm.  One dictionary I have defines an agnostic as someone who, among
> other things, neither affirms nor denies the existence of a personal
> Deity.  Being an atheist means that you deny the existence of God;
> therefore, you can't also be an agnostic.

http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/sn-definitions.html

Being humans, there is nothing stopping us from holding different
viewpoints about the same thing; I believe FreeBSD is better than Linux,
but I also accept that Linux has advantages and may be better in some
circumstances; I believe Ruby is better than PHP, but also accept that
PHP may be faster and more appropriate in some circumstances; I believe
God does not exist, but I also accept that there's not enough
information to make that judgement entirely sound.

> Or maybe you can.  I've also heard the definition as one who believes
> we can't know whether or not there is a supreme Deity.  I guess in
> this case, we can't know.

Well, what I described (or meant, which may not be the same thing :)
is kinda like the weak "default" position; lacking a belief in God and
thinking there isn't enough information for any strong arguments either
way.  Lacking a belief in God isn't the same as believing God does
not exist, but both fall under the term atheist..  I suppose atheist
describes a position, and agnostic describes a reason :)

Erm, anyway, I direct any further discussion to alt.atheist/atheism,
where I won't see it, cos I really don't care ;)

> > Don't worry, there are drugs available that can help restore your
> > sense of humor ;)
>
> Oh, I have a healthy sense of humor.  I just keep it in a closet, for
> special occasions, and to scare small children.

I tried that once.  We didn't get any more trick or treater's for
several years :)

-- 
Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst  -  freaky@aagh.net  -  http://www.aagh.net/
-
Don't I know you?

In This Thread