From: nobu.nokada@...
Date: 2002-02-15T00:20:03+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby and .NET

Hi,

At Thu, 14 Feb 2002 23:53:02 +0900,
Sean Middleditch <elanthis@awesomeplay.com> wrote:
> A types value in the .NET interpreter could be an object that holds a
> Ruby type-less value.  In fact, the types values in .NET would be
> nothing but object references (like VALUE in the C code for Ruby).

Ruby values have type, and variables are typeless.  They
differ.

-- 
Nobu Nakada