From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>
Date: 2002-02-24T04:45:36+09:00
Subject: Re: rdoc/xml questions

james@rubyxml.com wrote:

>> > As with the discussion on a Ruby-way XML API, rdoc may do best with
>> > a Ruby-way markup syntax (whatever that happens to be).
>>
>>It may well be so. But what's the problem with reviewing existing
>>schemas before developing a custom one?
>>
> 
> None. Never said there was. I came to my opinion after reviewing existing markup schemas.


This is going nowhere. So I misunderstood you, and you reviewed all 
schemas for describing OO structures? That was not clear from your 
posts; you were talking about reviewing existing schemas in general; I 
didn't know you meant schemas for describing OO structures for use with 
RDoc.

If that's the case, then others could review existing options on their 
own, and if Dave sees no fit, he/we start a custom one, or something 
like that.


Tobi


-- 

* peace&love.
* http://www.pinkjuice.com/