From: Sean Middleditch <elanthis@...>
Date: 2002-02-14T23:49:04+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby and .NET

Last I checked it was an ECMA standard... or is the bytecode not part of
that standard?

On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 09:37, Peter Hickman wrote:
> Erik B�gfors wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 15:22, Stephan J. Schmidt wrote:
> > in the first place.
> >
> >>I think integrating Ruby into Parrot might be a much better idea, or at
> >>least jRuby and jPython should throw some resources together and make it
> >>easier for other languages to compile to java bytecode. At least Java is
> >>more open then .NET.
> >>
> >In what sence?
> >
> >/Erik
> >
> The Java bytecode has a published spec, .NET bytecode has been largely 
> reverse engineered and MS makes no commitment other than to themselves. 
> Just like those undocumented API issues that used to plague Windows 
> developers.
> 
> 
>